Other Break Barrel VS. Underlever

That and it would greatly increase the weight unless they went with the problematic Hw57 loading system. There's other tap loading systems that work better but Weihrauch's not gonna invest in a completey new design when the age of high end piston guns is fast closing. Especially one that would have a very limited appeal. Heck what was Weihrauch's last all new design? The Hw90?

It's nice to dream but it's not gonna happen. I worked a long time for Mercedes and BMW and I'm quite familiar with German manufacturing philosophy. If they make an underlever equivalent of an Hw30, I'll buy one for you.
Gamo ditched their short lived pop up tap cf20 for a reason 30 years ago
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mycapt65
the 30 is super accurate. In the underlever form, it would be supremely accurate.
Unless improperly adjusted I don't think a 30 would be any more accurate as a fixed barrel. All three of my 30's (one's my wife's) are more accurate than my new to me 77. So far. If your 30's accuracy is off due to the pivot system (unlikely but possible) it just needs some talented tweaking. My 30's shoot as good or darn close to it as my two best Weihrauchs (95 & 97) out to thirty yards. Past that long flight times and or lighter pellets are mor susceptible to environmental influences. There's nothing inherently wrong with the design. Well other than the initial galling which has no bearing on accuracy.

The 99% of the advantage underlevers have in accuracy is their inherent extra weight. It dampens the effects of recoil on accuracy. Weigh down a break barrel and see the accuracy increase. Oh wait that's called a HW98. Instead of adding weight many people basically accomplish the same thing by decreasing power. Its hard to picture taking power out of a hw30 but you could lead plug the stock.

My experience has been that the barrel itself is the biggest factor in accuracy on these guns. Out of 13 Weihrachs I own in three calibers and the dozens I've had pass through my hands I've had good and bad barrels in all three calibers. My 177 95 is probably my most accurate with my 177 97 a close second. Don't get me wrong he 97 is easier to shoot accurately but the 95 will best it if I'm having a good day. I had two sequentially numbered 177 Hw77K SEs that had bad barrels that wouldn't group under 3/4" at 10 yards. My 30's are one hole at 10 yards and average 1/2" at 25
 
  • Like
Reactions: jps2486 and specie
Thanks for the response. I have been interested in the 57 as a “light” field gun. All of my underlevers are so heavy to carry around after a lifetime of shoulder injuries from motorcycle accidents. Even my D430 gets to be burdensome after an hour or so. If the new 57s keep up their reputation as accurate and reliable I’ll probably place an order with Krale. Take care!
The 57 is definetly a light field gun.