Talk me out of a Benjamin Gunnar.

I own 3 Turkish rifles:
Benjamin Akela .177
Benjamin Cayden .22
Reximex Daystar .177

I don’t know what kind of magic dust the Turks sprinkle on their barrels, but my experience is 3 for 3 for extremely accurate rifles.

Yes, I know how to tune them. Yes I polish up the triggers and the hammers and adjust hammer spring length - simple stuff to do, I posted tutorials here.

To shoot 190+ on the 30 Yard Challenge, you need your rifle to consistently group < .25” at 30 yards. The 10-ring measures .12”.

I’ve got my $450 Turkish guns shooting with my $2,000 marquis brand guns. So don’t let the AGN crowd tell ya that you need an FX, Daystate or RAW…

… my experience shows you don’t. Practice your shooting and that Gunnar will deliver.

-Ed

EPG TYC Best Scores 2.jpeg
 
I have really enjoyed the Gunnar. Life has prevented the trigger time I would like. I have tested JSB 25.39, HADES, and JSB 33.95 Mk II. It prefers the MK II at 820 fps. I do have other projectiles in route for testing. Now to find the range time.
Finding the hold the Gunnar likes and working on my technique is the key. My last group has proven its potential. Targets at 30 yds. off bipod after finding how it likes to be held. Ran out of time to go 50 yds.
I want to thank the AGN group for all the information I have found here.

View attachment 369373

View attachment 369374very nice groups, Benjamin guns are awesome on the lower end price of PCP. You made a good choice going with the 25 caliber with the heavier pellets because 99.9% of the time speed equals inaccuracy. Most pellets lose their accuracy after 930 ft per second anyway, unless you are shooting slugs you want to be between 800 and 900 for accuracy and stability. Slugs can handle higher speeds because of their shape. People never give way to foot pounds, always focus on speed instead. You made a good choice and it shows on paper
 
I like my Gunnar tho it had a warranty issue and is due back shortly. I shot it four weeks and discovered the de gas screw did not work so they took it back and replaced that part of it and it is due back. With the scope on it it is fairly heavy but bench rest shooting it works rather well The stock tightened up with adjustment on my part and I switched from sort of putting it in the closet to really liking it. The .25 cal. I have packs a pretty good punch. Is it a $1500-1000 gun? I think just below that. So why do I like it? They are selling new for $729 now which is what I paid and I think it is worth that with quality of build, general level of accuracy, very stable shot strength from the bottle, etc. Overall, at the $729 price I would say it is worth it. I just bought a used Brocock Commander Magnum xr in .22 and it was $1400 discounted from new at over $2,000. The Gunnar may not be quite as accurate as it when it comes but it is a pretty fair value at the price the Gunnars are now selling for in my view. Lance
20240314_153053 (1).jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: jlk1esoxnut
I have the .22 andI like the gun but it's definitely a bench or prone gun for me due to its weight. The only problem I've had was a loose stock tube (receiver extension/faux buffer tube). The castle nut is aluminum and a proprietary design with 10 notches so a regular AR stock wrench would not mate (and I didn't have a single-pin spanner wrench). I replaced it with a milspec castle nut. I came up with some 3D printed accoutrements for my Gunnar. I'll put pics below and the links where you can download the 3D models.

Bag rider
1000001341.jpg


Gauge bezels
1000001344.jpg

1000001342.jpg


Lower rail filler block
Gunnar wedge block.jpg


Magazine organizer/box
1000001345.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: jlk1esoxnut