Ask five airgunners what slug works best at grouping well at 50-yard tuning groups and at long range, and you’ll probably hear five different answers. The truth is, it’s not only about slug weight or twist rate. One of the biggest considerations a lot of airgunners don't realize is how well-suited that slug is for your bore size. It might be the most important variable when attempting to get slugs to perform well out of your specific rig. But what about all these groups we see on social media and here in the forums with amazing results? Well, there is often a story behind those groups and understanding that story will make you a more educated airgunner with real-world expectations.
At 100 yards and beyond, things get real and tell the full story when it comes to slug testing. Some air rifles will stack them at 50 yards and fall apart beyond that, but one thing I will guarantee is that this fallacy of a slug's ability to group at 100 if it was garbage at 50 is totally wrong. There is this concept we have seen posted for years in the online forums of projectiles going to "sleep" at a distance, leveling out their stability. If you have ever watched scope cam footage or witnessed yourself through your scope on a sunny day at the range, when a projectile starts to destabilize, there is no amount of "going to sleep" that is gonna fix the point of impact. We've seen pellets happen to spiral into a nice group because of a consistent instability that just so happens to have them spiral into a decent group, but move that target distance a bit forward or back, and now you have a shotgun pattern.
The other thing to point out is when we see those picture-perfect, tiny five-shot groups you see all over social media? It sometimes takes a bit of tuning and testing to get there. We are all a bit guilty of showing our best 5-shot groups, but we won't share those unless we know that is typical of our overall results on average. With that said, the importance of understanding statistical shot dispersion is important for every airgunner. If you have an MOA airgun slug and tune combo, you will 100% get some groups that open up after you shoot a statistically significant number of shots. It isn't ego or skill or sponsored content creation; it is just physics and statistical probability.
We've been digging into real numbers and testing from air rifles like the Karma lineup and FX platforms. If you’ve ever scratched your head wondering why your air rifle feels lights-out one day and inconsistent the next, or why a slug that looks great at 50 falls apart at 100, this is the discussion worth having. So how do you test your long-range slug performance? Do you trust small sample groups, or do you run the numbers until you see the full picture? This is a good, honest conversation to have... Let's hear it!
At 100 yards and beyond, things get real and tell the full story when it comes to slug testing. Some air rifles will stack them at 50 yards and fall apart beyond that, but one thing I will guarantee is that this fallacy of a slug's ability to group at 100 if it was garbage at 50 is totally wrong. There is this concept we have seen posted for years in the online forums of projectiles going to "sleep" at a distance, leveling out their stability. If you have ever watched scope cam footage or witnessed yourself through your scope on a sunny day at the range, when a projectile starts to destabilize, there is no amount of "going to sleep" that is gonna fix the point of impact. We've seen pellets happen to spiral into a nice group because of a consistent instability that just so happens to have them spiral into a decent group, but move that target distance a bit forward or back, and now you have a shotgun pattern.
The other thing to point out is when we see those picture-perfect, tiny five-shot groups you see all over social media? It sometimes takes a bit of tuning and testing to get there. We are all a bit guilty of showing our best 5-shot groups, but we won't share those unless we know that is typical of our overall results on average. With that said, the importance of understanding statistical shot dispersion is important for every airgunner. If you have an MOA airgun slug and tune combo, you will 100% get some groups that open up after you shoot a statistically significant number of shots. It isn't ego or skill or sponsored content creation; it is just physics and statistical probability.
We've been digging into real numbers and testing from air rifles like the Karma lineup and FX platforms. If you’ve ever scratched your head wondering why your air rifle feels lights-out one day and inconsistent the next, or why a slug that looks great at 50 falls apart at 100, this is the discussion worth having. So how do you test your long-range slug performance? Do you trust small sample groups, or do you run the numbers until you see the full picture? This is a good, honest conversation to have... Let's hear it!
Last edited:
