At no point in any of my responses have I claimed that there is no difference between high end and sub $1000 guns. It is the inability of anyone to quantify the $2000 difference beyond "because it is what I want".YOU feel this way, that doesn't mean that others agree. And that's why $3-4k + airguns sell.
Some people struggle to understand that a perspective different than their own is even a possibility. But we're all individuals.
You buy your expensive wine and enjoy it, and appreciate it. And guys that like to buy expensive airguns will buy them, and enjoy them, and appreciate them.
You trying to tell those of us that have experienced the difference between a high end and low end airgun that there is no difference, would be the same thing as us trying to tell you that there is no difference between boxed and fine wine. For those that are capable of noting the difference, there is indeed a difference.
That you assume I've never shot high end guns is on you for not asking. I've had multiple Walther LG400, FX Impact & King in my hands and going back FX Boss when it was new (the first PCP I ever shot). Which is why I know specifically that the difference in function is much less than you and others seem to believe. The Walther on the bench does show more but that is due to specificity of design. I liked the Boss so much I own the 3 siblings, Boss, Royale and Bobcat.
I also dont struggle in the least understanding the motivation of the non-competition air gun buyer spending $3,000 for an air gun. I pointed it out several times.
Been a lot of economic and psych studies and thesis written about said motivations. I've actually read a few of the published articles. I also read the hilarious responses to those studies denying those motivations.
Upvote 0