Taipan Comparing the Taipan Slash compared to the Huben K1 - Whether to buy a 1st release model instead of waiting for new owner feedback

I'm looking forward to the release of the Slash and hopefully some reviews soon after. I own two Taipan Vet 2's, one in .22 with 550 barrel and one in .25 with 700 barrel. Both rifles are accurate and great for shooting pests which is their main purpose for me. I also own a Huben K1 in .25 that is fun to shoot but has some drawbacks for my style of shooting. One is the non removable magazine that makes it more difficult to load and clean. It shoots accurate and fun to shoot just not as convenient as the Taipans. So, if the Slash turns out to be a winner with the reviewers it will probably be my next purchase because of the convenience of the removable magazines and the inclusion of a safety. The Huben has a safety but it is always live and a friend of mine that has one also has had it fire without depressing the trigger....Mine hasn't done that yet but it is always on my mind. The ability to decock the Slash is a BIG safety feature compared to the Huben. And it you forget to put the magazine locking lever back down after loading you will only get one shot then a jam. I'm not bashing the Huben as I enjoy it very much...just have to pay more attention to detail when loading and getting ready to shoot again.
 
Last edited:
The suspense got to be too much, so I just preordered the only .25 compact Tactical Slash listed on the Talon Tunes web site.
It may be risky to order a 1st release of a new model but it's also fun to be one of the first to get one to try.

I just relisted a custom-shortened K1 in the Classifieds under my 'one out for every new one in' rule to make room for it when the Slash finally gets here in June(?).

JP
 
Last edited:
The suspense got to be too much, so I just preordered the only .25 compact Tactical Slash listed on the Talon Tunes web site.
It may be risky to order a 1st release of a new model but it's also fun to be one of the first to get one to try.

I just relisted a custom-shortened K1 in the Classifieds under my 'one out for every new one in' rule to make room for it when the Slash finally gets here in June(?).

JP
Look forward to your impressions after you receive your Slash. The one you are getting is exactly the one that I am interested in! Hope that it meets your expectations. If so, it will probably be my next purchase.

Jerry
 
Look forward to your impressions after you receive your Slash. The one you are getting is exactly the one that I am interested in! Hope that it meets your expectations. If so, it will probably be my next purchase.

Jerry

I'm winding down my involvement with airguns so my Slash will probably end up in the classifieds within a year.

The number of dependable adjustable-power semi-auto hunting airguns is still relatively small.
The Huben K1 has been around long enough to have worked through any initial problems and might reasonably be considered as a high-quality semi-auto against which to compare other manufacturers' models. And Leshiy2s are another contender for their compact size and modular and interchangeable components.

The Slash isn't likely to be so radically different that it eclipses these and other models already out there. But every new model like this helps to drive innovation on the part of other manufacturers.

JP


Frame%2031613004%20%281%29%20copy.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phasor00
It's a Catch22!

I've been bit twice by FX new releases, and same by Kalibergun Kricket, but my Skout EVO which is kind of a 2nd gen gun, which has been out about a year, also had problems.

Semi's can be finicky, like my RX Revolution was, so I'm leaning towards waiting to get one, plus I already have a Steyr ProX which has been trouble free to enjoy, until, or if, I decide on a Slash.

As far as fun with a gun I enjoy semi's the most and my ProX is actually a fairly precise one. It tends to surprise me here and there how good it can be and one that was well worth the money. Though I suppose mine could be considered a 1st gen too.

Hopefully Taipans rep stays intact.
I’m all about the ProX 10 🤩
 
I’m all about the ProX 10 🤩

The Steyr Pro X always gets good reviews combined with comments about the high price. I don't see it listed in a semi-auto version though.

In my mind that's that's the fundamental difference between Hubens and the Slash and other more common manually cycled repeating models like the Pro X.

JP
 
The Steyr Pro X always gets good reviews combined with comments about the high price. I don't see it listed in a semi-auto version though.

In my mind that's that's the fundamental difference between Hubens and the Slash and other more common manually cycled repeating models like the Pro X.

JP
the Pro X 10 is indeed a semi auto... 10 rounds as fast as you can pull the trigger.... this air tube will shoot 3-4 magazines perfectly. It is not an automatic, but it "is" self indexing via a spring wound magazine, and it is "VERY" precise.
The price for a Steyr is relative to many things... in my case, the quality associated with a Steyr product of any kind is money well spent.

IMG_6837.jpeg
 
Last edited:
the Pro X 10 is indeed a semi auto... 10 rounds as fast as you can pull the trigger.... it is not automatic as in hold down the trigger and it keeps firing, but it "is" a self indexing spring wound magazine and VERY precise. The price is a non issue for some.. in my case, the quality associated with a Steyr is money well spent so the cost of a particular well made item may be worth the moolah to some.

I was just coming back around to delete my erroneous post about the Steyr Pro X not being semi-auto. Since a correction was already posted I'll leave my original post alone.

The Steyr Pro X picture I was looking at appeared to have a side cocking handle. I've never had a chance to shoot one and looked at the specs more closely after my post.

My first semi-auto was a Crosman 600 CO2 pistol that I got back in the 1960s. I loved that little cannon like any good 10 year old boy would, even though it only generated 2 or maybe 3 FPE on a hot day. I've had a few dozen single-shot and manual repeater airguns since then, but I still much prefer a dependable semi-auto action for convenience.

I was very happy when I bought a few AEA semi-autos in .22 and .30 some years ago. They were great initially for the low price, quite compact and powerful for the size. But the semi-auto on those all failed mechanically and I couldn't trust them. I've never had any serious cycling problems with my Hubens or Leshiy2s other than an occasional stuck pellet that didn't fit the Huben magazine correctly. I am mostly hoping that the Slash is dependable over the long haul but only time will tell on that.

JP
 
  • Like
Reactions: cavedweller
I was just coming back around to delete my erroneous post about the Steyr Pro X not being semi-auto. Since a correction was already posted I'll leave my original post alone.

The Steyr Pro X picture I was looking at appeared to have a side cocking handle. I've never had a chance to shoot one and looked at the specs more closely after my post.

My first semi-auto was a Crosman 600 CO2 pistol that I got back in the 1960s. I loved that little cannon like any good 10 year old boy would, even though it only generated 2 or maybe 3 FPE on a hot day. I've had a few dozen single-shot and manual repeater airguns since then, but I still much prefer a dependable semi-auto action for convenience.

I was very happy when I bought a few AEA semi-autos in .22 and .30 some years ago. They were great initially for the low price, quite compact and powerful for the size. But the semi-auto on those all failed mechanically and I couldn't trust them. I've never had any serious cycling problems with my Hubens or Leshiy2s other than an occasional stuck pellet that didn't fit the Huben magazine correctly. I am mostly hoping that the Slash is dependable over the long haul but only time will tell on that.

JP
The cocking handle is a funny thing on these Steyrs... if you do not "cock" it, the gun will not let you rotate or wind the magazine spring. It's like a weird safety feature?
 
It's a common enough situation. We start seeing teaser reviews of new airgun models at the annual shows. The technical specs look very promising and the overall appearance is acceptable. And after a person has owned enough different airguns they are often looking to try the 'best new release' as soon as it's available.

So I got an e-mail notice recently that the Taipan Slash is (soon to be) finally available. I've never owned a Taipan product but they usually get very good reviews. I've owned a few semiauto L2s and Hubens in the past and now that I'm older I strongly favor a semiauto over a manually cocked repeating action. At least when the semiauto functions correctly (no more AEA semiautos for me) and that can be quite expensive.

It would be interesting to be one of the first owners of a Taipan Slash. I think that it's especially true for anyone who is active on airgun forums and who likes to be the first to post their impressions of a new highly-hyped model. I've occasionally bought first-release models, like an Airmaks Krait imported before they were available here in the US. Unfortunately, the regulator used on that first model release was faulty and I ended up selling it as a sort of failed experiment before I got any use out of it.

One of the most useful features of new PCP airguns to me is the ability to easily adjust shot power using external controls which don't require the removal of the stock or degassing of the air tank for adjustment. A model like the Huben K1 is so successful in large part because the power can easily be adjusted from 8fpe to 80fpe.

Coming back around to the new Slash. It still isn't clear, to me anyway, how easy it will be to adjust the shot power. There is a warning (in the manual?) about not adjusting the regulator pressure as set by the factory, while one of the videos indicated that power can be adjusted, but didn't provide any specific details on the process. I expect that the large size of the shroud on the Slash, combined with a shorter barrel within the shroud, should make the Slash at least as quiet as a K1 when used at similar shot power.

And that is exactly the kind of info I'd like to know about the Taipan Slash before deciding whether to try one.
The K1 is a widely reviewed model with a good track record, many people on this forum have owned one.
And the cost of a K1, especially now that they show up in the classifieds quite often, is about $1,000 US less than the cost of a new Slash.

So how does the Slash compare to the Huben K1 in power adjustability and sound level?

Someone out there will eventually post their impressions and comparisons on their new Slash.
I wish that it was going to be me. But the K1 is already so good (except for having a fixed magazine and no caliber over .25) that I'll probably wait for someone else to take the first plunge this time around.

JP
I’m taking the plunge!I ordered the tactical version in .25 w the 550mm barrel.Talon T web sight says they will be in stock June 17 .
 
After reading 8 years of posts on this forum every time the next "latest & greatest" is released (regardless of which manufacturer) I've learned to NEVER even consider buying a 1st run of anything! Takes a year or 2 til the new & improved 2nd version comes out with all the "bugs" of the 1st version figured out. But that's me. NOT knocking Taipan, I've ALWAYS wanted to have one.
The Uragan 2 is a very very good example of this. Late model after some redesigns just before the U3 are ok, but again perfect example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bernieorosz
The Uragan 2 is a very very good example of this. Late model after some redesigns just before the U3 are ok, but again perfect example.

I can't disagree with you, and you're 100% correct!! We don't NEED this new gun now, and should know better and just wait... Let the 'other guys' beta test for us!

But, as I type this, I'm still debating a pre-order... :).

BTW, was the Uragan 2 that bad when it first came out? I'm not familiar with that gun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fishing43