• The AGN App is ready! Search "Airgun Nation" in your App store. To compliment this new tech we've assigned the "Threads" Feed & "Dark" Mode. To revert back click HERE.

Leshiy 2 explodes

... because here we are trying to be constructive as to how much it does for the L2 ...
I am not going back to search for your comments, just a Question to you:
What is your gain if this thread proves just anything? Or better how far you willing to push your idea whatever it is worth?
btw, yes, I have a L2 and serves my game well.
 
I am not going back to search for your comments, just a Question to you:
What is your gain if this thread proves just anything? Or better how far you willing to push your idea whatever it is worth?
btw, yes, I have a L2 and serves my game well.

I am not here to prove anything, so what idea am I pushing? Nor am I here to derail, discredit, or disprove the progression of the thread. How about yourself? What do you gain by venting?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigHUN
Ok everyone get your stones ready!

There may have been a freak one to million fault in the first 470bar test, a piece of O ring was in the pump when I serviced it today, it was in the port where pressure goes in to the gauge.
It is a possibility that the O ring piece prevented full pressure showing in the gauge and the pressure was something between 470-700bar.

I pressure tested both cylinders from Ed today, conical set just for the piece of mind.
460bar no permanent deformation. So not yielding.

The straight bottom one I tested first to ~460bar and to he sure it was not near the yield point I tested again to 520bar
No permanent deformation.

Cylinders provided by Ed, not for testing but to get the gun working again after I destroyed them for science and safety.

This results wont void the fact the sharp corner is an issue but reassures the material is truly what Ed said it is. With the conical bottom I don't see an issue why I wouldn't use the gun.

So my apologies to Ed for doubting the material, and my sincere thanks for delivering the cylinders so I could run the test again.

Marko
 
Ok everyone get your stones ready!

There may have been a freak one to million fault in the first 470bar test, a piece of O ring was in the pump when I serviced it today, it was in the port where pressure goes in to the gauge.
It is a possibility that the O ring piece prevented full pressure showing in the gauge and the pressure was something between 470-700bar.

I pressure tested both cylinders from Ed today, conical set just for the piece of mind.
460bar no permanent deformation. So not yielding.

The straight bottom one I tested first to ~460bar and to he sure it was not near the yield point I tested again to 520bar
No permanent deformation.

Cylinders provided by Ed, not for testing but to get the gun working again after I destroyed them for science and safety.

This results wont void the fact the sharp corner is an issue but reassures the material is truly what Ed said it is. With the conical bottom I don't see an issue why I wouldn't use the gun.

So my apologies to Ed for doubting the material, and my sincere thanks for delivering the cylinders so I could run the test again.

Marko
No stones here I thank you for everything you’ve done, it’s crucially highlighted differences in the tube manufacturing that remain of concern, we all need to check tubes for flat or conical for peace of mind. We all want the safest possible setup, regardless of the OP . Thank you sir 🙏🏻
 
Ok everyone get your stones ready!

There may have been a freak one to million fault in the first 470bar test, a piece of O ring was in the pump when I serviced it today, it was in the port where pressure goes in to the gauge.
It is a possibility that the O ring piece prevented full pressure showing in the gauge and the pressure was something between 470-700bar.

I pressure tested both cylinders from Ed today, conical set just for the piece of mind.
460bar no permanent deformation. So not yielding.

The straight bottom one I tested first to ~460bar and to he sure it was not near the yield point I tested again to 520bar
No permanent deformation.

Cylinders provided by Ed, not for testing but to get the gun working again after I destroyed them for science and safety.

This results wont void the fact the sharp corner is an issue but reassures the material is truly what Ed said it is. With the conical bottom I don't see an issue why I wouldn't use the gun.

So my apologies to Ed for doubting the material, and my sincere thanks for delivering the cylinders so I could run the test again.

Marko
Just so you are aware, in some countries you could be sued for libel.
 
Just so you are aware, in some countries you could be sued for libel.
Are you serious? 😳 🤣 The test was done for safety and there was no ulterior motive. No manufacturer bashing and no criminal intent. Finnish law does not consider these events to be against any criminal code.
The test was done in Finland, so no Finnish laws were violated.
Unreal bs... 💩

You are more likely to be sued when you use Pink Floyd's album cover on your avatar
 
Last edited:
Are you serious? 😳 🤣 The test was done for safety and there was no ulterior motive. No manufacturer bashing and no criminal intent. Finnish law does not consider these events to be against any criminal code.
The test was done in Finland, so no Finnish laws were violated.
Unreal bs... 💩

You are more likely to be sued when you use Pink Floyd's album cover on your avatar
Denial is a river in Egypt.

You have a good day now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maddot
View attachment 331953saw this on the leshiy 2 Facebook page
Screen Shot 2023-05-12 at 8.51.55 AM.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pariah