Anyone that has first hand knowledge of their scopes and how do they compare with others?
How visible is the reticle at the lower magnification?I have an S-TAC 4-20x50 SFP. Other than the scope lacking numbers on the parallax knob, the scope is decent for what I paid. The glass is pretty good and it’s built feels solid. I don’t dial turrets, but they didn’t feel bad when I sighted it in. Grab one on sale and you probably won’t be disappointed.
I have several including the 40mm beast with ED glassAnyone that has first hand knowledge of their scopes and how do they compare with others?
Well, if you have a Sightron with a loose knob, it's your fault . As long as it is not from abuse they will repair it. Of course all the good companies will. If you spin the knob constantly rather than click it some companies consider that abuse, which it is.I have a SVED on one of my bench rifles that is four years old and is shot from 100 to 1000 yds, turrents have been used hard. I have never heard a comment regarding a turrent problem. I do know they have an excellent reputation for great warranty service.I've shot Sightron 10-50X most of their older FT models, Falcon 10-50X, Hawke 10-50X, and (discontinued) Leupold 40X.
IQ for all 4 were comparable. Ranging finding and consistency was easiest with the Sightron, Falcon, and Hawke (in that order).
The exception was the Leupold it doesn't snap in and out of focus at those critical 40-55 yards (for example, clarity was hard to discriminate between 40-43 yards sometimes...so I usually just take the average).
The Sightron and Hawke models I had were illuminated reticles. The rest were not.
I've heard that the Sightron turrets thens to wear out. Not an ideal situation when you are clicking for FT shooting. The newer models may have addressed this issue (not sure). I do have an older Sightron with looser elevation adjustments, I just don't click and shoot mil-hash instead.