Do someone knows the main technical differences among this two rifles?
I would like to know which one should be considered better for what and because of what.
Own a Uragan in .22 and two Vulcan 2 one in .25 and another in .30 Cal. All perform perfectly, the Uragan might be a little more comfortable to shoulder and gives more shots per fill.
Vulcan 3 gives a lot of shots per fill, is very comfortable to shoulder..... I do not know why should I decide for a Uragan 2 in .25 Cal or for a Vulcan 3 both with 700 mm barrel. Vulcan 3 seem easier to fix your self, but I do not know the advantage the Uragan 2 can have over the Vulcan 3 to have taken Airgun Technology the decision of making them as a new line.
I would like to know which one should be considered better for what and because of what.
Own a Uragan in .22 and two Vulcan 2 one in .25 and another in .30 Cal. All perform perfectly, the Uragan might be a little more comfortable to shoulder and gives more shots per fill.
Vulcan 3 gives a lot of shots per fill, is very comfortable to shoulder..... I do not know why should I decide for a Uragan 2 in .25 Cal or for a Vulcan 3 both with 700 mm barrel. Vulcan 3 seem easier to fix your self, but I do not know the advantage the Uragan 2 can have over the Vulcan 3 to have taken Airgun Technology the decision of making them as a new line.
Last edited:
