What causes those markings on the bottom of some FX guns?
- By DesertSilver
- General Discussion
- 3 Replies
It's from the screws not being lined up when the person is trying to screw things back together.
Upvote 0
Wack em!This was filmed on my old setup so no sound of the shot just some background sound I added. This chuck was 50 yds away. I was using my Daystate Wolverine B HiLite in .25 loaded with JSB Kings.
It could be that his camera doesn't play well with the specific concave or other glass characteristics of this scope as well but if so you would think that he would make a comment that it only looks like that when there's a camera looking through it. We will never know unless we hold the exact same scope he's holding, so we will never really know. I do know that I have formed my own opinion which is that he is very likely intentionally misrepresenting the sight picture because it benefits the manufacturer he is affiliated with and gets people talking when he presents things that way.Yall could be right. It would be hard to believe he is not biased against vortex. Given the content of some of his other videos. However. He could have legitimately got a bad scope. Vortex could have knowingly sent him a bad one to make him seem like a fool. Or it could be user error. I'd like to think it's not intentionally misleading. But any of it is possible.
Not looking for an argument here So I guess am outdated. I think I am fine with this.Actually bottles are now out dated, the new thing is reservoir over barrel.
Not everyone wants a bottle hung on their rifle, they are bulky and ugly. Okay for bench shooting I suppose.
LMAO we'll call is "projectile FUBAR"Holy smokes!! You guys didn’t have a clipping issue. You had an issue that we need a new word for.
THAT WAS IT!!!!!! I just asked, he looked at his toes, and admitted it. Two of the long 38 gr got double loaded. Ok well that solved it.Possible the kid double loaded.
My 48 is for sale too, Nikon scope and soft case included, if you know of anyone looking. Apparently I can't post until 10 days goes by as I'm a new member.I too have a Diana 48 in .177 which is why I was interested in this article. I bought mine for the power and accuracy it afforded me.
I was absolutely leathal with mine. I was like Chuck Conor's with mine. Nothing got away. It was no Weihrauch though. CrowAll good points I didn't think of.
I can't figure out what rules have changed, can you expand on that?