Hello! I was watching a video on YouTube, and the man said that there are pellets/slugs that perform poorly at close range but perform well at long range, and that they can stabilize with distance.
Is that possible?
Because if a pellet/slug doesn't group well at close range, it will be even worse at long range, since it's already destabilized up close, and this would only get worse with more distance, right?
Yes, it's possible, but with a notable asterisk being that the close vs. long range performance must be relative to another projectile.
As an example, if a person is shooting a well-tuned gun with standard dome/diabolo pellets, they might see a 0.25" CTC group at 30yds. That result is sub-MOA. Very nice. But when they move out to 100yds, the groups open way up to 6.0" CTC, nearly 6 MOA, and what most would consider quite poor. So that scenario shot great at close range and poor at long range.
Now if we compare that to a higher BC projectile like a slug, you may see a 0.5" CTC group at 30yds. A little over 1 MOA, so decent, but not as good as the pellets. But then move the range out to 100yds, and the slugs may print 2.0" CTC groups. Quite a better better than the pellets at that range, largely due to the better BC.
So this was an example of where in a relative manner the slugs performed worse (relatively) at close range, but better at long range. The key is that it is relative to the other projectile, and this is why you will sometimes hear such comments that a projectile is better at long range than it is at short range. It's basically an incomplete comment, but can be true when taken in the full context.