Air Arms Utah Airguns Pyramyd AIR FX Airguns Daystate Diana Airgun Depot Edgun West DonnyFL: PCP Air Rifle Shop and Airgun Moderators The Pellet Shop Airforce Airguns
Saber Tactical Optisan Side-Shot Scope Cam NE Airguns Baker Airguns AGS Topgun Airguns Predator International Huben Airguns Huma-Air Shooting Supplies Hurricane Luftvapen AEA Precision Airguns H&N Impulse Air ZAN Projectiles Hawke Optics Stud Mag Loader RX Target Systems Sports Match Scope Mounts Altaros Banner CTA Thomas Air Hatsan USA Georgia Air Guns Skout Airguns Nielsen Specialty Ammo Patch Worm Weihrauch Sport Talon Tunes Airgun-Revisions JTS ST7 PPP RTI AirStryk Industries Macavity Arms Vector Optics Corbin

HW/Weihrauch  THEOBEN HW/90 ADJUSTABLE GAS RAM

I got to think . That kinda money for what real use ? Once in a blue moon to tinker ? Not like your dragging it out everytime you go shoot unless it's leaking and needs airing up every time..lol
If it was someone’s only rifle. It would be a fantastic choice IMO due to the fact flexibility is so easy, but at a cost. I’ve never had one apart. Not sure. Mine haven’t leaked at all. I find it to be a very unique gun. One spin around the dial. Crow

What Paper Target Did You Shoot Today

I got some AEA Center Punch pellets from The Pellet Shop recently and finally shot a string with them this morning. Shot the 25.3gr, shooting the first three targets before making an adjustment. Man, probably the best string I’ve ever shot.

Ignore the other rows, I still shoot and dabble daily but I didn’t want to continue to flood this thread.

FX Crown MK2 .25
AEA Center Punch 25.3gr
20 yards, 1/2” circles aiming at the 2.5mm center circle.

IMG_5363.jpeg

FX  The Sub 12 airgunners DRS tac

Sweet. I generally stop any YouTube video from over the pond as generally it won’t apply to my uses because of the power restrictions. Not sub 12. Watch them all 👍
thank you very much, it's great to hear that people from the US are watching 👍

What happened to the JSB Knockout 20.83 Slugs???

Thanks! I've tried NSA's in 17.5gr, 21. and 23 gr. I LOVED the fit and quality of these slugs, but my barrel wasn't as fond of them :p
That's a bummer, the only other thing that I could see potentially helping is, if you know, order the sampler pack of slugs from HN. Some slugs dont fit great due to the diameter, but because it has too much contact on the walls.

For example, hybrid slugs are .217 but they almost fit like a .218
  • Like
Reactions: Gear_Junkie

Barrels  WTS FX 25 caliber 500mm barrel kit w probe and DonnyFL Moderated Shroud $120 shipped

This is a full barrel kit, including 500mm .25cal superior liner, barrel housing, pellet probe, and Donny FL moderated shroud for FX Impact. Asking just $120 shipped for the Full barrel kit (liner, housing,shroud, probe). I also have 2 mags and a speedloader I can throw in, full package for $160to your door. PayPal F&F or venmo LOWER 48.
20250820_165306.jpg
20250806_081850.jpg
20250806_082007.jpg
20250806_081904.jpg


20250806_081941.jpg
  • Like
Reactions: JaceSpace1369

Skout  Everything Skout EVO and Epoch

Wouldn't we all! This needs addressing - a long time ago.
As an Epoch owner, I’m so grateful for this sort of research and modification info. I am looking to better understand the relationship between HP and LP reg settings and how they affect velocity, ES, and SD. Any experts out there?

The low-pressure (LP) regulator on the Skout EVO airgun controls the air used to operate the rifle’s pneumatic cycling mechanisms—essentially managing the spool valve that releases air to propel the pellet. This is different from the high-pressure (HP) regulator, which governs the air pressure directly behind the projectile. The two regulators work in relation to one another, and fine-tuning both is key to proper cycling and overall performance.





Because the EVO platform is still relatively new, there isn’t an official manual that specifies what each pressure setting does. Part of the reason is the near-infinite variability in tuning. My own testing is still in the early stages, especially since I’ve been experimenting with modifications to the HP regulator and transfer port.

Before the modifications, the LP regulator didn’t seem to make a huge difference, but I did notice that turning it up resulted in a more forceful spool valve cycle and slightly tighter groups. Since then, I’ve made several changes: I enlarged the transfer port seat on my .177, modified the needle valve inside the HP regulator body, and refined the overall airflow path. These adjustments have allowed me to run both regulators at significantly lower pressures—while actually improving results.

Performance Comparison:

  • Pre-modification:
    • Pellet: 13.43 grain, .177 caliber
    • Velocity: ~800 fps
    • HP regulator: ~2000–2200 psi
    • LP regulator: ~200 psi
    • Accuracy: Good, but not outstanding
  • Post-modification:
    • Pellet: 13.43 grain, .177 caliber
    • Velocity: ~820 fps
    • HP regulator: ~1000 psi
    • LP regulator: ~100 psi
    • Accuracy: Exceptionally tight groups—often same-hole shots

Finally, on the dwell setting: I’ve kept it as low as possible while still allowing the spool valve to open. If the dwell is set too low, the valve won’t open; set it too high, and it won’t close correctly. Striking the right balance is essential.

unfortunately, the dwell setting is not exactly like increasing or decreasing a hammer spring where you’ll see a 2-3-4-5-6 ft./s increase. Maybe just an ever so slight tightening of groups.

Hope this helps more than it adds to any confusion. 😂

very small

"I suspect that those clamp-on levels are ok. And they are surely better than nothing."

So long as you take the time and make the effort to make it as level/square/"calibrated" as you can, yea itll be fine for range and field work

Not talking about micrometer precision here, just trying to keep the rifle as vertical as possible. Think of it as a feedback device...
i assume your talking about the scope tube mounted levels ? That is easy , just hang a string with a weight as a vertical reference and line the vertical in the scope with that string about 10 or 20 feet away

What pistol did you shoot today

Early AM ( 9:30 ) i put on long pants to weed whip . only 80 out so not bad , just finished 11:30 ( 85 now ). I need to find someone with the hobby of weed whacking . planning on shooting IZH 46 and Morini then springers .
Maybe if you tried it my you might enjoy more…lol

IMG_2266.jpeg
  • Like
Reactions: beerthief

very small

I suspect that those clamp-on levels are ok. And they are surely better than nothing.

But I do wonder if the level, its mount, the barrel, the block, the mounts and the cross hairs are all in sync with the picatinny.

...Yeah, worked with engineers too long, I always worry about cumulative tolerances.

I use the scope tube mounted levels that I can zero to a plumb line.

Cheers!
When I leveled my scope, I used a clamp on barrel level, as well as the picantinny rail level to level the gun along with a level on the scope mounts, before using a level on the scope turret. I trust the picantinny mounted level because of the verification with the other levels.
  • Like
Reactions: Chasdog

Epic  Epic 2 with the AVS slugs

After getting the correct slugs for my taipan vet 2’s , I decided to revisit my epic 2 in 25 cal, both the LW poly and CZ barrels, 550mm. Both Steve and myself knew the LW poly liked smaller diameter slugs than the CZ. Well, the LW poly liked .2523 38g AVS slugs- just over 1/2 MOA at 54 yards. I then quickly zeroed at 103 yards and dropped 1 out of 4 groups at 1 MOA. Now this was at the end of our session and my HS screw came loose. Now I’m planning to expand this test with both barrels in detail next Monday hopefully. Now my CZ barrel likes .254 40g and/or 42g whichever is best will be 1 MOA at 100. In the end, both barrels are equal in slug accuracy- with the correct fitted slug.

very small

"I suspect that those clamp-on levels are ok. And they are surely better than nothing."

So long as you take the time and make the effort to make it as level/square/"calibrated" as you can, yea itll be fine for range and field work

Not talking about micrometer precision here, just trying to keep the rifle as vertical as possible. Think of it as a feedback device...

What happened to the JSB Knockout 20.83 Slugs???

Your other option is nsa, they make them as small as .215 or .2155. The .2155 and .216 have worked phenomenally in my CZ guns before (cricket 2 .22 choked barrel)
Thanks! I've tried NSA's in 17.5gr, 21. and 23 gr. I LOVED the fit and quality of these slugs, but my barrel wasn't as fond of them :p
  • Sad
Reactions: JaceSpace1369

Target Shape & Scope

I set seven .177 diabolos on their skirts and marked where they touched and the outer edge of the outer two pellets, this gave me the measurements for a 4 ring target: inner ring 1 pellet wide, next ring 3 pellets wide, next ring 5 pellets wide, and the last ring 7 pellets wide.

I made square, circle, and diamond shaped paper targets using these deminsions.

At 25 meters the square gave me the highest scores, the circle next highest, and the diamond the lowest.

Each night shoot, I would shoot 10 bulls with my .177 M3 and 10 bulls with my .30 M3, for a total of 40 bulls for each shape shot under very, very low to no wind conditions.

Scored best edge . worst edge the .30 had the highest aggregate score for each target shape with an aggregate of 10.739 to the .177's 9.843.

Then out of boredom I changed to the M16A1 25-METER ZERO TARGET.

I use an MTC SWAT PRISMATIC 10×30 on the .177 M3 and a 20×50 on the .30 M3.

At 25 meters at night I cannot see the center dot or the ring with the 10×30 so I have to aim center mass of the torso. With the 20×50 I can see the center dot and ring but the crosshairs cover the dot so again I center mass the torso.

Both the .177 and .30 scores jumped into the high 10.9s.

Inside the 4 squares surrounding the dot is the 10 ring, the next ring of squares is the 9 ring, the next ring of squares is the 8 ring as long as the hit is inside the white circle, outside the circle is zero points. Target is scored best edge . worst edge.

So why is this my highest scoring target using these scopes?

Square shape of torso?

Square scoring rings?

Aiming center mass of torso provides a huge Bullseye and allows the eye to determine the center of target easier.

Lower magnification lowers relative amount of crosshair movement on the target?

All the above?

Need a barrel OD ground

what do you need ground on the barrel.. muzzle or breach? I likely can do it in my lathe with a live center.. PM me if you want to.
Mark
Just the breech end.

If your lathe can skim .000-.002 per side without chattering or making it worse, it could work. I assumed only grinding would work here because of the varied and minimal stock allowance.
  • Like
Reactions: markhooper

Filter