• Please consider adding your "Event" to the Calendar located on our Home page!

Why no slugs allowed for most 100yd airgun benchrest?

Originally the 100 ebr was designed by FX and AOA. If you read the rules you'll notice they are what they are to give FX guns an advantage over other guns.

Back then their ST barrel barely spun the pellets which are rear stabilized anyway unlike slugs which need more spin so no slugs.

Even FX admits that a faster twist rate in barrels (like LW) have a slight advantage up to 50 yards because they stabilize quicker but can become over stabilized as the pellet slows down so the longer the range the greater the FX advantage.

Also they banned tethering because FX had the largest air cylinders at the time. Then they added that the air cylinders couldn't exceed 580cc. What a coincidence that's what FX uses and they didn't want anyone to have a larger one.


 
Well...the current competitions are held by essentially 2 manufacturers, so it would honestly seem unusual for them to not make the rules to suit themselves. The general public has voiced their opinion of acceptance by attending these matches in large masses. There seems to be no reason to change anything if the current formula is producing success for them. If FX or Daystate will be favorably compensated for a particular change in the rules...it will likely happen. Nothing really mysterious about that. As long as the masses are happy with the rules of the game being dictated by two competing companies...things will continue to move forward on the timeline that fits their needs.

Mike 
 
That’s great. I hope they still have EBR with the Covid-19 situation in AZ.

I’ve been following this thread, and still can’t seem to wrap my brain around what “rated” means for distance with pellets or slugs. Rated by who, why, and when? Mike N has already shown in a posted 25 shot group that the state of the art is approx 0.8 inches with pellets at 100 yards, so 1/2 inch with a .30 plug seems to make the current targets pretty close to what is currently capable with a very accurate gun and pellets in ideal conditions...
 
It think it has to do with the ridiculous amount of wind drift in typical match conditions. If guys are shooting at twin mattress size 25 shot targets and are still shooting onto their neighbors card accidentally in heavy wind...I think they could use a projectile with a better BC. The same guys will be at the top...but maybe the lower end shooters won’t be putting shots on the wrong cards.


Kinda like golfing in the woods compared to a playing a nice course. 😀 The game is hard enough on a nice course.
 
See, now there I totally disagree. When I played to a low single digit handicap, the harder the course the better I did... must have to do with concentration.

I don’t know what “distance ratings” are with pellets or slugs. How far? Minimum accuracy for rating? At what speed? With what gun? When were the ratings done? Do they factor in modern air rifles?

Of course you’re exaggerating with the amount of drift, but I do get your point. The most I’ve seen at 100 yards was about 14 inch (4 Mil) drift at 100 yards with a .30 Cal. 44.75 grain JSB. Most of the time the drift is 1/2 to 2 Mil at 100 yards. 
 
...

I’ve been following this thread, and still can’t seem to wrap my brain around what “rated” means for distance with pellets or slugs. Rated by who, why, and when? 

...

1596054958_721352055f21ddae2ac389.00359277.jpg

 
Not sure.

The fit of a JSB slug is pretty loose to make a seal. LW groove dimensions are .003” bigger than the biggest slug you can buy . If you made it to fill the groove...it probably wouldn’t go down the barrel from the excess friction. Driving bands would fix that, and JSB could accomplish that since they still use a split die for their slugs. I think the accuracy could be improved...but I’m guessing they don’t care. 
I’m not willing to cast slugs to find out. For now, I cannot get a good enough wind advantage out of the factory slugs at 50y to justify their use. At 100 they are significantly better than the monster comparing drift.

Mike 
 
Apparently so. But for the JSB there are no limits... ;) I wonder where H&N dreamed up those moronic numbers anyway...?

JSB does imply what we can expect at different distances with their Exact pellets. From the JSB web site:

http://www.schulzdiabolo.cz/en/pellets/exact-jumbo-22/

--------------------------------------

EXACT JUMBO .22

If you ever hear about a Diabolo pellets .22 cal. inaccuracy, recommend your friends to get information about the results of sporting shooters hitting small targets up to 50 meters, or about enthusiasts activities using JSB EXACT JUMBO in unbelievable distances (see references). Or do you think that the central dispersion of 19mm in 102 yards (about 90 meters) is the sign of inaccuracy? If so, we are talking about air guns.

Due to its weights, a specially designed shape, perfect distribution of the centre of gravity and alignment the JSB EXACT JUMBO products are the best choice for longer-distance shooting. Exact products, just as all the other products, undergo a thorough hand-picked quality control. We guarantee the quality of the products, the rest of successful shooting is entirely up to you ... Ammunition tested by 45 meters shooting. The required result after five shots is a group where centre to centre of the shots is up to 16mm.

-----------------------------------------

Not sure why they keep saying "inaccuracy". Maybe something messed up in the translation. I'll assume they meant "accuracy".

"central dispersion of 19mm in 102 yards"
That's 1.40 MOA

"...45 meters shooting. The required result after five shots is a group where centre to centre of the shots is up to 16mm."
That's 1.18 MOA
 
Interesting. I think the conversion is 25.4 mm per inch, so 19mm is well under an MOA. Or we’re understanding differently what central dispersion means? Not sure, but it’s clear as mud. But I do see where you’re going with this. I’m pretty sure all the write ups from the manufacturers are based on older tech and not current state of the art airguns. 
 
Interesting. I think the conversion is 25.4 mm per inch, so 19mm is well under an MOA. Or we’re understanding differently what central dispersion means? Not sure, but it’s clear as mud. But I do see where you’re going with this. I’m pretty sure all the write ups from the manufacturers are based on older tech and not current state of the art airguns.



"central dispersion of 19mm"

"Central dispersion" would be the measurement from the center of the group. If the dispersion is random, we can approximate the resulting center-to-center spread between pellets by multiplying the central dispersion by 2x.

2x19mm = 38mm

38mm at 102 yards is the same as:

38mm/25.4"/mm = 1.496"

1.496"@102yds = 1.40 MOA

They imply it could be 1.40 MOA at 90m. They don't actually say it can do that, they just ask if you think it is a sign of inaccuracy.

They do say 16mm c-to-c at 45m, and that is 1.18 MOA.

You are right about it being clear as mud.