Pellets produced by JSB in Czechoslovakia are the highest quality overall, and the overwhelming choice of most benchrest and field target competitors for the last decade or so. Since I began shooting airguns, I have not found any that are better.
That said, they are imperfect, and many serious shooters go to great lengths to find JSB pellets from different lots that are "liked" by their guns. I have attempted to understand all the reasons behind this complexity.
JSB is a pretty small company, notwithstanding. It appears that they have about 100 employees, and 20-30 of them are involved with manual inspection and sorting.
Hard Air Magazine published a
nice online story about JSB in June, 2016, and
another good article about the names and labels they use.
Airgun Web TV has an https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbHqPbMHAmM with the US Distributor for JSB, Predator International at the 2018 Shot Show.
Steve Scialli of
Airgun Exploration and Advancement Channel had an https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OQpiwYS8C8&t=316s at the IWA 2018 show, and discussed the operations at JSB.
Further insight:
JSB produces a
"Premium" pellet, specially packaged and selected a few years ago (circa 2015). These sell for a "premium" price, too - $15 for a 200 pc tin. The fact that JSB themselves are doing some special selection seems to reaffirm that it can be productive to do some sorting.
Hard Air Magazine reviewed this pellet, and Tom Gaylord
published a BLOG on the
Pyramyd Air website in August, 2015, and also a
BLOG post about the "Premium" pellets. Giles at
Airgun Gear Show also published a
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mo3U9TVcotA. So, if you checked all these links, you know "what is up", at least to some extent. I believe that the issue is one of process control. JSB does have a degree of control, but they depend on manual visual inspection to a great degree. They have expanded production rapidly, and they have new equipment being used. The number of presses and die sets is great, and the tooling changes are extensive.
It seems that they do sample pellets from each lot, and they test these by shooting groups for a maximum of 5 mm at their inside range. This is an interesting idea, and should have merit. Even so, the group size limit is close to 2 MOA.
I am speculating that the 0.01 mm changes in head diameter are not based on specific tooling for a planned diameter, but on a sorting "binning" that reflects process variations during continuing operations. It hasn't been shown that any manufacturer has better process controls, and the end result is that many users are doing their own inspections and "binning".