I have looked into FFP scopes and have been scared away from them due to the fact that at low power the reticle is small. All the scopes I have currently are SFP and most are CVLife 4-16X44 AOL. I do like them for the 50$ Amazon price, especially since they are on PCPs that I seldom need to shoot past 100 yards with. Two other scopes that I recently purchased on Amazon were a Discovery 5-20X50 side parallax adj for 170$ it also is SFP. I unfortunately am sending it back due to the “Hawk” style reticle being to fine for my old eyes to see as well as the I Phone 7 camera doesn’t pick the up that well. The other recent purchase is a UTG 4-16X40 with side parallax adjustment and it has a supposed 36 color reticle. Can’t comment on the color amounts, not having good color vision, but it is a hell of an improvement over the CVLife scopes as is the Discovery. Both of these have way better turret dialing and barely any lag in adjustment. The CVLifle scope, when dialing windage and elevation have serious lag time often before the crosshairs, mil-dot, start to move and make me wonder if that’s why the guns they are on have to be re-zeroed occasionally. If I made videos and shot at distances like Matt Dubber and other of his caliber, had a gun with sub MOA capabilities, I would look for a higher end scope. FFP seems to be more effective at a greater distance than SFP. A larger reticle on a far away target, especially a small one, might get covered up by the larger reticle of a SFP scope where as the FFP reticle would be more in line with the magnification and the target. Everyone is different when it comes to scopes and the best advice given may not be the best for your particular needs. Like these fine people have said” try it out if you don’t like it you can always sent it back.