So being a firm believer in the whole "form follows function" thing, I have long been wary of air pistols that try to emulate the appearance of cartridge pistols. Always seemed to me that designing the air pistol to look like a specific firearm makes the primary concern appearance and not performance. I do enjoy shooting both air and cartridge pistols, but on the rare occasions where I've decided to give air pistol replicas a try, like the Umarex 1911, they've not performed well (failures to cycle/fire), even if the handfeel is good.
Since replica pellet pistols are obviously not my specialty, perhaps I'm not getting the right models, or having unrealistic expectations (though I do read through reviews before I buy). And right now, I really like the look of the pellet versions of the 1895 Nagant and the MkVI Webley revolvers. I'm a sucker for anything olde tyme and those are a lot cheaper to purchase and feed than the originals.
What're your thoughts on the concept of replicas in general, and, if relevant, those two replica revolvers in particular?
Cheers,
dgfd
Since replica pellet pistols are obviously not my specialty, perhaps I'm not getting the right models, or having unrealistic expectations (though I do read through reviews before I buy). And right now, I really like the look of the pellet versions of the 1895 Nagant and the MkVI Webley revolvers. I'm a sucker for anything olde tyme and those are a lot cheaper to purchase and feed than the originals.
What're your thoughts on the concept of replicas in general, and, if relevant, those two replica revolvers in particular?
Cheers,
dgfd