Thanks everyone for the quick replies so far. Seems the votes are leaning towards the Vulcan 2, which was my original thought as well. I appreciate the feedback!
~~~~~~~~~~~~
I read your OP 24 hours ago when it was initially posted. At that point I was reluctant to respond simply because
I feel that you can't go wrong with either of the bullpups you're considering -- the Vulcan2 or the Wildcat MkII.
I have owned the FX Wildcat MkI in .25 caliber for about a year now. I also have an AGT Vulcan Tactic Gen 4 in .22 caliber and a Vulcan2 Tactic in .25 caliber --
"semi-bullpups". Frankly, the choice of which gun is better is strictly a matter of personal preference. The Vulcan(s) are heavier than the Wildcat. Consequently, if I were to go hunting, I would choose the Wildcat. For me the Wildcat's trigger was more adjustable -- therefore, I prefer it to the Vulcan(s).
The Vulcan(s) come with the Picatinny rail standard vs the dovetail rail on the Wildcat.
The Vulcan(s) have a slightly better magazine, although the lever action on the Wildcat is smoother.
The Vulcan(s) still have -- annoying to some -- the ping sound when fired. I don't mind it, but the Wildcat's sound is sweeter.
The Vulcan(s)' stock comes prepared for mounting a bipod, while the Wildcat's stock requires more work to mount the bipod.
The Vulcan's lever is on the left side of the rifle. But get this, although I'm right-handed, this setup is preferable to me, because I don't have to take my right hand away from the trigger.
*Now for the important part:
Both these guns are absolute "TACK DRIVERS" and I can not discern any difference in the accuracy between the two.
Take your pick of which to buy first.
As you will most likely own both in due time. PS: I am currently awaiting the arrival of my recently purchased Vulcan2 Bullpup .30 caliber in Laminate. Updates and pics will follow.