tx200 mk3 vs prosport vs hw 97
- Thread starter jobet28rgn
- Start date
I don’t think you could go wrong with any of these. I researched these a year ago and finally went with the TX200 and don’t have any regrets. Gorgeous rifle, amazing trigger, tack driver. Target is my first 3 shots @ 25 yards. It has gotten better after break in.
Upvote 0
I love them but: as a right handed left eye dominant, cold PA Winter .177 person. I hate that shark fin in my face.
I'm still searching the a adjustable ambidextrous right side loading TX200HC.
Once they're tuned, buttoned piston & depends on your class. Sub 12 or factory 16. I've seen both put hole in ragged hole at 30+ yards with no wind.
I'm still searching the a adjustable ambidextrous right side loading TX200HC.
Once they're tuned, buttoned piston & depends on your class. Sub 12 or factory 16. I've seen both put hole in ragged hole at 30+ yards with no wind.
Upvote 0
Never owned a Pro Sport, but have shot one. The underlever on them is awkward at best.
The stroke length on the TX200 is too long in my opinion and makes for a bouncy shot cycle. They are also prone to breech lockup issues.
I've had multiple HW97/77s and TX200s and I won't fool with the TX again. The HW97 has a better shot cycle and less issues. In .177 accuracy is a wash between the two.
People are quick to mention that the TX is better out of the box, and are then quick to mention how easy it is to take apart lol.
Either will probably suit you fine. But I strongly prefer the 97 for many reasons.
The stroke length on the TX200 is too long in my opinion and makes for a bouncy shot cycle. They are also prone to breech lockup issues.
I've had multiple HW97/77s and TX200s and I won't fool with the TX again. The HW97 has a better shot cycle and less issues. In .177 accuracy is a wash between the two.
People are quick to mention that the TX is better out of the box, and are then quick to mention how easy it is to take apart lol.
Either will probably suit you fine. But I strongly prefer the 97 for many reasons.
Upvote 0
I've had all 3 . The Pro Sport cocking lever grates on your nerves after a bit ...At least to me it did .
The TX shot cycle is exactly as Thumper stated , at least just my experience with them and I've owned 3 . They are just gorgeous rifles especially a nice walnut one . But they are arent a 97
The 97 has a whole different feel . They leave you with the impression the pellet has already gone before you feel a thing . It's my favorite of the 3 by far . I've owned my last TX and Pro Sport ...But Definitely not my last 97 . ...It is just effortless to shoot well , at least for me .
A sub 12 ft lb 97 is a true laser .
The TX shot cycle is exactly as Thumper stated , at least just my experience with them and I've owned 3 . They are just gorgeous rifles especially a nice walnut one . But they are arent a 97
The 97 has a whole different feel . They leave you with the impression the pellet has already gone before you feel a thing . It's my favorite of the 3 by far . I've owned my last TX and Pro Sport ...But Definitely not my last 97 . ...It is just effortless to shoot well , at least for me .
A sub 12 ft lb 97 is a true laser .
Upvote 0
Of those three guns, my experience is limited to the Prosport, so my opinion is less relevant to your question. Having said that, I've never found the underlever awkward, and in fact would put that among its best features. It's invisible when closed, and easy to operate. If you polish it up and round the corners (easily done in an hour or so, but hardly necessary), it feels even better in your hand when cocking. But again, one person's experience with one gun.
Upvote 0
As long as your tossing around choices, a Diana Md. 54 Air King should be in the loop. The recoilless action stretches out your distant shots. Try one out, you will likeky. Notice I am shooting from a tripod. That would not work with most spring guns.
Upvote 0
Just my opinion to me the 97 feels really small. The Pro Sport I like I have one but the only thing I don't like about the proof work is the thickness of the grip. The TX200 feels very good in my hands plus I think that the checkering is way better looking on the PX then the Pro Sport. The thing I don't like about the Tea exes the noise of the ratcheting or the release of the bear trap whatever it's called.
Upvote 0
I don’t think you could go wrong with any of these. I researched these a year ago and finally went with the TX200 and don’t have any regrets. Gorgeous rifle, amazing trigger, tack driver. Target is my first 3 shots @ 25 yards. It has gotten better after break in.
I am new with airgun. You have got an impressive rifle. It makes me envy. Whats your set up? I mean, scope, ring, pellets etc. I've checked pyramid air but its out of stock. AOA seems like not selling this particular rifle as I checked their website.
Upvote 0
I haven’t owned 97. I have owned pro sport. Nice but I sold. I have TX and 77K SE. I like both of these and can tell little difference.
Upvote 0
Hi Joe,
I've watched your youtube videos and I am happy about your dedication of informing airgun enthusiasts about your ideas, opinions and experiences. I am newby to airgun and need a lot of suggestions, opinions from the experts like you. Keep posting.
Right now, I am caught between TX and 97. Still trying to learn and educate myself. If you will allow me, please give me your set up like scope, rings, pellets.
Upvote 0
I have both,the TX is better for taking your time shooting and is better to the eye.I say because my 97 in a black thumb hole plastic model.
The 97 is way easier to load and is extremely accurate,plus mine is a .22.....The TX fits me better,I had to get a adjustable butt plate for the 97,it now fits me .
The truth=I want to like the TX more,but the 97 is faster to load,easier to shoot and is better for "knocking around,plus just as accurate.
I got the TX in lefty model because that is the way I shoot,Unfortuntly I am right handed and loading A pellet in the left sided loading port is PITS.
For fun the 97,for looks,feel and slowing down the TX.....
The 97 is way easier to load and is extremely accurate,plus mine is a .22.....The TX fits me better,I had to get a adjustable butt plate for the 97,it now fits me .
The truth=I want to like the TX more,but the 97 is faster to load,easier to shoot and is better for "knocking around,plus just as accurate.
I got the TX in lefty model because that is the way I shoot,Unfortuntly I am right handed and loading A pellet in the left sided loading port is PITS.
For fun the 97,for looks,feel and slowing down the TX.....
Upvote 0
I read about TX is tuned ready to use out of the box. Does the HW97 does not. Do I need to tune HW97 before firing it? How do you tune it? Sorry it may sound or look stupid its because I am. Literally new to airgun. Please some experts explain it to me and simplify it.
Upvote 0
G
Guest
Guest
No stupid questions,only stupid answers!
TX200 one of the best ever, HW97 the same ,but no tuning needed. One looks better than the other but when I shoot I can’t see my gun
.
Mitch
TX200 one of the best ever, HW97 the same ,but no tuning needed. One looks better than the other but when I shoot I can’t see my gun
.Mitch
Upvote 0
Scope is a Discovery optical sight HS 4-14X44 SF FFP MIL. I’m sorry but I do not remember what the rings are. The scope is super clean glass, very fine reticle and I love the look of the hexagon shape on the scope. Mainly shoot jsb 10gr
Upvote 0
Interesting comments. If you read about each model, lots of references to having to clean excess grease from all of them.
I have a tx but tried a 97 as well before settling on the TX. As mentioned, I have played around and tuned my TX, which is very easy to do. Others do the same with the other models.
If you can, try each before deciding and, if possible, try tuned versions alongside standard variants.
I have a tx but tried a 97 as well before settling on the TX. As mentioned, I have played around and tuned my TX, which is very easy to do. Others do the same with the other models.
If you can, try each before deciding and, if possible, try tuned versions alongside standard variants.
Upvote 0
My HW97kt got twangier over the 2 years I've had it. Obviously, I need to put some tar on the spring or get a custom spring guide. However, ever since I got my Walther LGV that HW97kt sits in a corner and doesn't get shot. If an underlever is what you are wanting, I'd include the Walther LGU in your list of guns to consider. people bitch about the trigger on the LGU/LGV's but if you're not a trigger snob (like me) its good enough for sure. Well, that is if you can find one.
Upvote 0
Much the same here. My HW is nice and accurate but the LGU is the one kept busy. And a little work can bring the trigger to a much better point.
Upvote 0
Got the TX200 out after work. JSB 8.44gr. It shoots better than I can produce, but this is a good start.
Upvote 0