Hey There.
I have bought me a .30 FX Crown MK2 a few months ago.
Right out of the box it was shooting pretty sweet with some 1 to 2 inch groups at a 100 yards with the 44 grain jsb's MK2. So far so good for a beginner like me.
I have also bought me a .25 barrel kit and have started to tune the rifle with the 33 grain jsb's. I have used the method from Meathead Marksman, turning the hammerspring to max and with every shot on turn back(1/6th rotation). That worked fine and I found a sweet spot at about 16 turns back.
Now the .30 was set out of the box to 24 turns back from max hammerspring tension. I have tuned the riffle again with the .30 and came to the conclusion that this is the correct sweet spot.
My question is: how is it possible that a smaller caliber needs more hammerspring tension than a bigger caliber? One should think the opposite is true?
Now I am shooting my .25 at max on the hammerwheel, and my .30 at nr5 on the hammerwheel.
I have bought me a .30 FX Crown MK2 a few months ago.
Right out of the box it was shooting pretty sweet with some 1 to 2 inch groups at a 100 yards with the 44 grain jsb's MK2. So far so good for a beginner like me.
I have also bought me a .25 barrel kit and have started to tune the rifle with the 33 grain jsb's. I have used the method from Meathead Marksman, turning the hammerspring to max and with every shot on turn back(1/6th rotation). That worked fine and I found a sweet spot at about 16 turns back.
Now the .30 was set out of the box to 24 turns back from max hammerspring tension. I have tuned the riffle again with the .30 and came to the conclusion that this is the correct sweet spot.
My question is: how is it possible that a smaller caliber needs more hammerspring tension than a bigger caliber? One should think the opposite is true?
Now I am shooting my .25 at max on the hammerwheel, and my .30 at nr5 on the hammerwheel.