To all pellet and slug manufacturers!!!!!!!!!!

Problem with doing that is the BC will be different depending on what barrel and velocity combo you are using.

Yeah, and even then it can change depending on velocities and environmental conditions! Case in point, the variation of these 47gr NSA HP .300's out of my R5 long at 947fps in 75F in >30.00hg was 0.078, and yesterday in 48F 29.89hg it was 0.068 at 903fps. Winds were about the same, used velocity averages at 50y and 100y from LabRadar.
 
I hit send before I finished writing.. I was going to say that I agree, there should be some references given of some kind. Case in point - had I have known that the BC of the 47gr, I would not have got into this .30 cal nor all of the ammo that i got for it..

1558887168_19303180955ceabb008afcd2.04046047_0D48AE18-2559-4C6B-9BA9-FB18C8F080A5.jpeg


I was lead to believe they would have been closer to 0.09 - 0.12, not the case. Any sort of base reference point would have enabled me to make a more educated purchasing decision.
 
For the starting point you were asking for: 👍

A year ago I searched high and low for BC numbers, in published sources and on forums. I gathered them all and combined them into one big table.

Sorry, only .22 cal done comprehensively (I do have a collection of .177 and .25 BCs, just not nicely finished yet). And only pellets with a BC of at least 0.020 made it into the table (and any kind of hollow point regardless of BC). Other pellets just don't interest me, as I have a windy ocean on one side where I live, and mountain winds on the other.... 😉



Link is here: https://www.airgunnation.com/topic/bc-table-22cal-comprehensive-internet-wide-collection-of-ballistic-coeff-data/

Matthias


 
The data from HardAir Magazine I have incorporated into the BC table mentioned in my previous post. They did a great job of gathering this data.

Also included are BCs from other sources, using sometimes a higher, sometimes a lower muzzle energy than the HardAir test. It is important to consider what BCs others have found — as there are sometimes quite large differences....

H&N has published the BCs for all of their pellets on their webpage.



I think the future of the ballistic coefficient lies in measuring BC at different velocities and using a variable BC rather than a static BC. 😊

Strelok Pro allows us to enter 5 different BC values for 5 different speeds, and Srelok Pro and ChairGun (for Windows) allows to enter an even more detailed drag coefficient function.



In the near future I'd like to try and create a drag function specifically for the PCP I'm getting, once I figure out its favoite pellets. 😎