The most accurate high power fixed barrel springer/gas ram is....?

Windmill, you got me wondering exactly what would be the difference between a .20 and .22 pellet of roughly the same weight if shot from guns having the same muzzle energy. And here is the answer using a .20 caliber BC obtained from my own Harrier data, and the .22 caliber BC from the HAM tables.

1572733292_2158015495dbe016c215519.41409457_JSB 20.jpg


1572733354_10880566125dbe01aae6aed8.89814815_Baracuda 22.jpg


Once zeroed for the same distance of 35 yards, trajectories are essentially identical. The only difference I can find is that the .20 pellet, due to higher BC retains more energy at 50 yards, 11.5 fpe versus 9.2 fpe for the .22 pellet, and I doubt the soap could tell the difference. Hopefully that clears things up.


Sadly there is not nearly the selection of pellets in .20 that there is in .22. I've always had a soft spot in my heart for the caliber (.20) but I have only one barrel in my collection and it is not on the Talondor I bought it for ... anyone want a lothar walther .20 12" barrel for a Condor? ;)
 
My vote is the Theoben Dual Magnum. It's not for everyone, but I'd easily pick it over a Whiscombe. I own a JW65 & 80 too. Save yourself the headaches and just buy a 30ft. 20BAR PCP. Far superior in every respect. The AA 4xx or 5xx PCP guns will outshoot all the springers/rams in my stable - and I have them all.

Sonnysan, I own a Marauder, and it too shoots very well - it’s very accurate, even at its price point. I just can’t warm up to pcp’s. I live out in the country. That said, I don’t have enough real estate to shoot a pcp comfortably. A rifle with about a seventy yard range is all I want. I like the challenge of a springer at that range. Your right though, pcp’s have taken air gunning to a whole new level. 
 
Ironox how’s that new HW97K going.

Gary

Gary, the 97k is very well made, handsome, and has a nice feel in hand. I can understand why it has a terrific following. The shot cycle is easy to get used to, and the sound and vibration are what I consider minimal. I shoot only alloy pellets, and the H&N greens shoot well. I plan on getting the mic out to measure pellet heads to fine the ultimate size necessary for maximum accuracy. I haven’t found it yet. It’s a heavy rifle, but that okay. I shoot from a bench anyway. So that I can shoot with iron sights once in awhile, I may add a 77 to the arsenal....or maybe a Diana. 
 
Ironox thanks for the update, yes everyone that has one sings it’s praises. It’s good to hear you are enjoying it, there’s not much to complain about with a Weihrauch. When get the chance you’ll have to post a photo of it.

I use the greens straight from the tin and very very rarely get a flyer and if I do it’s only about half an inch away at 30 metres 

The other day a pest bird landed in a tree out the front of our house. It was approx 50 metres away. My ethical shooting distance has always been up to 40 metres but I thought I’d give it a go. Useing the 12.65 grain green Barracuda pellets, one mil dot holdover, the pellet went through the hard part of the wing where the quills are and through the upper side of the chest. It was dead instantly. You really can’t beat these Hw’s for accuracy.

Gary
 
All you fellows bragging about those high end german and english underlevers, I'm curious to know if they are that accurate for hunting right out of the box or are they all tuned to get to that level of braggery??

This has been the subject of debate lately, as I suspect many times before. My experience has been that an accurate gun is accurate with or without tune. Perhaps marginally more accurate with the tune. However the tune usually makes the gun much more pleasurable to shoot. 

Perfect and accurate statement. I would only tune a gun that was accurate to start with. There are exceptions, but a gun that's not accurate out of the box turns into a smooth shooting inaccurate gun, after a tune.