Every once in a while, I see the word “weapon” interchanged for airgun.
I have a hard time adjusting to this word usage in our sport. Airguns are guns.. sure I get this. And yes, they can inflict damage like their cousins. But, I still have reservations every time I see airguns referred to as a weapon. Call me old fashioned, but I have always considered a weapon to be something used in war, or by drug cartels to secure their stash, or some evil villain’s device used to blow up the world.
I have taken up several expensive hobbies in my years. Whether I am cycling, backpacking, playing guitar, woodworking, or shooting with airguns. I always refer to any of these objects as tools. With regards to my airgun hobby, I use them to target shoot, hunt, and even as visual art. I have never considered any of my airguns as weapons. I don’t own any “powder burners”. But if I did, I would definitely consider it a weapon if not used as a tool (again, targeting shooting, hunting or some art installation).
Today, I looked up the definition of weapon just to make sure I am not way in left field with my thinking. It appears that airguns could inflict bodily harm, or damage, but I am sure that none of the manufacturers intend for this when designing them. Sure, there are those who blow up watermelons with the Evanix style semi’s, and those testing HP and big bores on concrete block. But, I think calling an airgun a weapon is a stretch in the wrong direction.
top
I have a hard time adjusting to this word usage in our sport. Airguns are guns.. sure I get this. And yes, they can inflict damage like their cousins. But, I still have reservations every time I see airguns referred to as a weapon. Call me old fashioned, but I have always considered a weapon to be something used in war, or by drug cartels to secure their stash, or some evil villain’s device used to blow up the world.
I have taken up several expensive hobbies in my years. Whether I am cycling, backpacking, playing guitar, woodworking, or shooting with airguns. I always refer to any of these objects as tools. With regards to my airgun hobby, I use them to target shoot, hunt, and even as visual art. I have never considered any of my airguns as weapons. I don’t own any “powder burners”. But if I did, I would definitely consider it a weapon if not used as a tool (again, targeting shooting, hunting or some art installation).
Today, I looked up the definition of weapon just to make sure I am not way in left field with my thinking. It appears that airguns could inflict bodily harm, or damage, but I am sure that none of the manufacturers intend for this when designing them. Sure, there are those who blow up watermelons with the Evanix style semi’s, and those testing HP and big bores on concrete block. But, I think calling an airgun a weapon is a stretch in the wrong direction.
top