Strelok pro taught me I have a lot to learn, and re-learn... and a question....

Long story short, I starting really diving into the Skyhawk and Discovery scope I got used in September 2019 starting in March, jsut before the Covid thing really started to erupt.

The scope mildot's are true at 10x. The Strelok table shows the corrections in MRads........ Thats where the disconnect started.... The reticle view was obviously showing something else mildot-wise.... what the heck?????

One thing Ive learned over the years, when stymied its back to basics. Back thru the scope data, back thru strelok and found the one input field asks for the magnification it ranges true at... 10x. The light bulb began to glow a little....I flipped back to reticle view, set the mag there at 10x.... and that view and the table agreed. AHA! So that part solved.... 1.5 mils is 1.5 mils no matter the mag. How the reticle shows 1.5 isnt as straight forward.

Found a response to a comment on a long range forum about that exact issue. They said you can divide the true mildot mag by the power your scope is set to and find the "multiplier" for the 10x data to be true at 24x--".416" Back to Strelok, took a couple of table entries for holdovers, did the math, back to retilce view..... and they matched. 

Its not math I cn do in my head on the fly, but Excel can. :)

SO my question: If the elevation data at 10x can be calculated for other mag levels, can I am assume that the windage data will also require being "recalculated" for 24x?

Im gonna say yes, but Im wrong alot, so Im open to that possibility. :)








 
Dan, 😊


I'm trying to figure out what it is you want to know. 👍🏼 Let's see if I got this straight.



🔶 (1) You have a SFP (second focal plane) scope on your gun — where the reticle is calibrated at 10x magnification. Right?



🔶(2) You want to aim using holdoffs with your scope's reticle — not dialing the turrets. Right?
And you want to use holdoffs not just at 10x calibrated power, but at any power.



🔶(3) You want Strelok to give you the correct reticle view so that you put your bulls or quarry in the same spot on your scope's reticle as what Strelok's reticle view shows you. Right?




🔶 ➔ That should not be a problem. 😊


Make sure you have done the following:
▪Select the correct scope. And if it is SFP or FFP. And the magnification at which the (SFP) reticle is calibrated.
▪Put in the correctly measured scope height above the bore (critical).




🔶 Below are a couple pics of Strelok's reticle view. One at 18x, the other at 7x.
You notice the different holdoff points (different mils for both elevation and windage) —
— though the range (56y) to the target is the same,
— and the wind (4.6mph from the right) is the same for both reticle views.

Also note in the top right corner (where it says the magnification that you selected): It gives a conversion factor — maybe the one you mentioned in your post.



Hope this helps! 😊



🔶 Now, if you had an FFP scope (first focal plane) you'd only get one holdoff point — no matter the magnification.
So, only one set of holdoff data to memorize or to keep on a dope card — for any magnification you choose.


And if your turret and your reticle speak the same language, either both mil or both moa — you can choose to dial those same holdoff data with the turrets. Or the elevation with the turret, and windage with the reticle. And never have to think about what magnification you're currently using.... 😊 


Matthias



1590211088_18975760775ec8b210802f73.98393851.png


1590211642_18183903485ec8b43a246818.76714745.png







 

SO my question: If the elevation data at 10x can be calculated for other mag levels, can I am assume that the windage data will also require being "recalculated" for 24x?

Im gonna say yes, but Im wrong alot, so Im open to that possibility. :)

Yes, if you are expressing windage in an angular measurement (mils, MOA). I should have added, you can get Chairgun to do that for you by just changing the effective magnification. It will then recalculate everything as if you were shooting a SFP optic.
 

(1) You have a SFP (second focal plane) scope on your gun — where the reticle is calibrated at 10x magnification. Right?


correct



1f536.svg
(2) You want to aim using holdoffs with your scope's reticle — not dialing the turrets. Right?
And you want to use holdoffs not just at 10x calibrated power, but at any power.

correct



1f536.svg
(3) You want Strelok to give you the correct reticle view so that you put your bulls or quarry in the same spot on your scope's reticle as what Strelok's reticle view shows you. Right?



no. i have strelok setup correctly. if i was just using the reticle view id have been just fine. what i was whining about is the table in strelok ONLY shows the corrections at the ranging magnification.

so i assumed that as i changed mag powers in the app, the table would change also. apparently thats not true. :)

finally figured out what was happening.... and what multiplier i need to use to make the 10x data true at 24x. after that, the table and reticle view matched.... and i felt kinda silly



lesson learned. i did find out how to make the 10x to 24x correction for the table data, so it was worth the brain-fart.....









 
IraLite,

for non-rushed target shooting at predetermined ranges SFP works just fine.



But I'm totally with you on the FFP for any type of rushed shooting at changing ranges (like hunting)! 😊 

▪Only one set of holdovers to print on a range card!

▪Only one set of holdovers to memorize!

No limit to the magnification I use! (no need to only use the magni that the reticle was calibrated for — why buy a variable-mangi scope and lug it around in the first place?!)! 

But old habits die hard (or do they at all?).... 😄




Fortunately it seems that most scope manufacturers are finally getting the FFP idea, and selling them not as a "specialty" item, but more mainstream — with the prices at very reasonable levels.



I found the largest selection of FFP scopes in the sub-$500 category (with 10y parallax) from Discovery, Vector, Hawke, and Athlon.

And UTG still needs to get on the FFP train.... Wonder when they'll show up at the station.... 



It's truly a great time to be an airgunner!! 😄

Matthias
 
Thus why I hate second focal plane scopes, an extra pain in the $#%. I'll take the heavier first focal plane with its invisible reticle at min. magnification.


Well the advantage to an SFP is you can use it as a ranging device if you truly understand what happens with the reticle as you zoom the optic. So with SFP you get "stadia" lines to use when ranging objects by measuring the angle they subtend at various magnifications and you get the "focus" wheel as well. Two ranging inputs for one. You can do the same thing with an FFP but it is much harder to do accurately at the lower magnifications for the reason you cite.
 
I solved part of that issue by swapping on the only FFP scoe I have. 6-24 Athlon, set to about 18x cuz any higher and the "bottom" of the reticle disappears..... I ccan see cranking it up for some shots but at the ranges Ive been shooting it, its great @18x

And now having learned a lesson on this, the setup for the FT rifle will be soooooooooo much easier. Likely not gonna buy a scope for a while, but Im really liking the FFP setup
 
Greetings,

I have a Sniper ZT5-27x50FFP. It is mounted on my .22 cal RTI Prophet Performance. 
I would like to have a ballistic trajectory with the wind drift and other variables plotted for my scope so I could use it for long range shooting to be able to hit a target with a shot or two. Totally new using something like this and just started to learn. Might be a little better if my scope was on the list. Lots to learn!

Thanks
 
Greetings,

I have a Sniper ZT5-27x50FFP. It is mounted on my .22 cal RTI Prophet Performance. 
I would like to have a ballistic trajectory with the wind drift and other variables plotted for my scope so I could use it for long range shooting to be able to hit a target with a shot or two. Totally new using something like this and just started to learn. Might be a little better if my scope was on the list. Lots to learn!

Thanks

I have had to find a comparable scope and reticle that fit the perimeters of the scope I had mounted. You just have to work within the listed scope's magnification range. Choose one the the same focal plane and click value and that has a reticle that looks similar.

Athlon Helos BTR 6-24X50 APLR2 FFP MOA
 

I would like to have a ballistic trajectory with the wind drift and other variables PLOTTED for my scope so I could use it for long range shooting to be able to hit a target with a shot or two.



When you say "PLOTTED"...

(1) Do you want a GRAPH or LINE in a chart, with the x-axis maybe wind range, and the y-axis maybe wind drift (or other values)?



(2) Or do you want a TABLE, with range from say 10y to 100y in the first column in 5y steps, and each column after that with wind drift, velocity, energy, etc., for each range?



(3) Or do you want an IMAGE of your reticle, that shows at what range you have to use which of the hash lines for your hold over and for your wind correction?



Strelok Pro does (2) and (3). On screen, and for print-out.



The No. (1) you can get from GPC Ballistics Applications, a full suite,
for Windows, Android, iOS, Linux, here:
https://GPC.fotosoft.co.uk/Home.html

ChairGun is also usable, though since a few years unsupported. The Windows version is still extremely powerful and functional.



Matthias




 
That’s awesome. Thanks so much. I’ll download GPC on to my desktop. I have Chairgun as well but only I’m my iPhone. Can’t seem to get to open and run on windows 10 ( not IT savvy) but GPC will do just fine. Between the Strelok pro app and GPC that will cover everything!! I’ll plug in the Athlon scope you suggested and let the learning curve begin.

Thanks again for taking the time to help me out I really appreciate it!
 
That’s awesome. Thanks so much.

[...]

Thanks again for taking the time to help me out I really appreciate it!



That's how our airgun community works.... 😊

You receive, you share, you help, you encourage, you correct — all the while having a lead-pile of fun!! 😄 



Thanks for your words, Gman. 👍🏼

Matthias