Long story short, I starting really diving into the Skyhawk and Discovery scope I got used in September 2019 starting in March, jsut before the Covid thing really started to erupt.
The scope mildot's are true at 10x. The Strelok table shows the corrections in MRads........ Thats where the disconnect started.... The reticle view was obviously showing something else mildot-wise.... what the heck?????
One thing Ive learned over the years, when stymied its back to basics. Back thru the scope data, back thru strelok and found the one input field asks for the magnification it ranges true at... 10x. The light bulb began to glow a little....I flipped back to reticle view, set the mag there at 10x.... and that view and the table agreed. AHA! So that part solved.... 1.5 mils is 1.5 mils no matter the mag. How the reticle shows 1.5 isnt as straight forward.
Found a response to a comment on a long range forum about that exact issue. They said you can divide the true mildot mag by the power your scope is set to and find the "multiplier" for the 10x data to be true at 24x--".416" Back to Strelok, took a couple of table entries for holdovers, did the math, back to retilce view..... and they matched.
Its not math I cn do in my head on the fly, but Excel can.
SO my question: If the elevation data at 10x can be calculated for other mag levels, can I am assume that the windage data will also require being "recalculated" for 24x?
Im gonna say yes, but Im wrong alot, so Im open to that possibility.
The scope mildot's are true at 10x. The Strelok table shows the corrections in MRads........ Thats where the disconnect started.... The reticle view was obviously showing something else mildot-wise.... what the heck?????
One thing Ive learned over the years, when stymied its back to basics. Back thru the scope data, back thru strelok and found the one input field asks for the magnification it ranges true at... 10x. The light bulb began to glow a little....I flipped back to reticle view, set the mag there at 10x.... and that view and the table agreed. AHA! So that part solved.... 1.5 mils is 1.5 mils no matter the mag. How the reticle shows 1.5 isnt as straight forward.
Found a response to a comment on a long range forum about that exact issue. They said you can divide the true mildot mag by the power your scope is set to and find the "multiplier" for the 10x data to be true at 24x--".416" Back to Strelok, took a couple of table entries for holdovers, did the math, back to retilce view..... and they matched.
Its not math I cn do in my head on the fly, but Excel can.
SO my question: If the elevation data at 10x can be calculated for other mag levels, can I am assume that the windage data will also require being "recalculated" for 24x?
Im gonna say yes, but Im wrong alot, so Im open to that possibility.