Side lever cocking vs. bolt action cocking

Bolt action just feels better. Personally can not wait for the old style Theoben to be back in production. Cycling an MFR suits me better than a side lever.

However I'll fire any airgun you will hand me.





John

+1 I like bolt action also but have owned quite a few sidelever guns and liked em just fine. My favorite bolt action (might be hard to believe) was my Walther Rotek. It was about the only thing I liked about that gun haha. Rotek is basically an 850 air magnum. The Rotek bolt felt just like a .22 rimfire bolt action to me.
 
I prefer The bolt action on my wolverine and huntsman to the lever on my hw100 and s510. I find the bolts are much faster to cycle than the levers and feel more robust. That said the bolt on my s400 is a bit wimpy and the skdelever on my buddies impact is pretty fast to use.

So for me there's no real winner when it comes to the operation. Really depends on the gun and design. I think either can be good or bad.

Aesthetically though I prefer The look of the bolts.

My $0.02


 
Thanks for all the comments! I really need to get to AoA to test fire the side lever actions on the FX Crown, Wolverine R, and then Red Wolf. I'm sure I would enjoy shooting the Red Wolf, but there is something about being an electric gun that I just don't get excited about.

There is the extra effort required at the end of bolt action to cock the hammer spring on the Bantam. It's ok and certainly do-able. It's just that I think I would enjoy a lighter, smoother side-lever action, that doesn't take my eye from the scope, much more.
 
Since FX has been heavily into side lever actions, but Daystate seems to have only recently gone with side lever designs, might FX have perfected the feel and reliability of side-lever designs more than Daystate might have?

I’m just curious, as I have no idea on this. It just seems that FX might be farther down the road toward perfection of side lever design than Daystate. I haven’t operated either one, though, so I have no direct experience with it. Could be that Daystate’s side lever design is every bit as nice feeling and reliable, if not better, than FX? Given what Daystate charges for their models, one would hope that they’re even better designed and made.

To me the lever on the FX Crown feels much better than the Wolverine R, Its shorter and offers more resistance but feels solid and works well, The Daystate is still nice but feels flimsy in comparison and mine has a lot of play
 
Since FX has been heavily into side lever actions, but Daystate seems to have only recently gone with side lever designs, might FX have perfected the feel and reliability of side-lever designs more than Daystate might have?

I’m just curious, as I have no idea on this. It just seems that FX might be farther down the road toward perfection of side lever design than Daystate. I haven’t operated either one, though, so I have no direct experience with it. Could be that Daystate’s side lever design is every bit as nice feeling and reliable, if not better, than FX? Given what Daystate charges for their models, one would hope that they’re even better designed and made.

To me the lever on the FX Crown feels much better than the Wolverine R, Its shorter and offers more resistance but feels solid and works well, The Daystate is still nice but feels flimsy in comparison and mine has a lot of play

That's interesting, and good to know. Thank you. Obviously either gun is a sweet shooter, with the Crown being more versatile (calibers and power levels) and the Wolverine probably having a much more beautiful stock.