I completely agree with you here about using the Peletgage to sort your current best performing pellets into batches of 100th of a mm as that's exactly what I did and was surprised by how clear the evidence from the resulting groups was, (which for my FX400 was the 5.52 slot in the Pelletgage). I have now re-sized various pellets down to 5.52 and done a bit of testing but in windy conditions so not quite ready to publish anything - however, despite that, it seems so far that the performance of the re-sized pellets is going to be as good as those that were 5.52mmm straight from the tin."Pelletgage"
My recommendation is to all seeking the "liked" pellet - first sort out enough pellets of a type you have, in order to get some batches that are 0.01 mm apart, and shoot ten shot groups from each batch to find the head diameter that groups best for your rifle. Then, when buying pellets, sample 10% or more from a new tin. Calculate the mean of your sample. Not more than one pellet should exceed 0.01 mm from that mean - two sigma variance is the goal (95% within +/- 0.01). The sample mean should be no more than 0.02 mm different than your desired size. Now, if you are shooting a match, the half hour that it may take to sort every pellet you'd need for the match might still prevent one flyer.
I always find that gaging the first 50 or so tells me everything needed about that tin of pellets.
So fingers crossed, the Pelletgage and a pellet resizer may have solved the pain of owning a high quality rifle that is not as "accurate" as it should be...
One interesting thing that also looks like it may emerge is that going down to 5.50mm ie: 0.02mm smaller than optimal has a far more dramatic effect than being 0.02 larger at 5.54mm so a looser fitting pellet is going to effect accuracy much more than than a tighter one...
Upvote 0