Rws Diana 48/52

The Diana 48/ 52 is an excellent high power springer. The trigger isn't as good as the Rekord on HW springers but still very good if you adjust it right, which I did find was quite a fiddly process. It is a heavy gun which actually helps dampen the recoil but can be difficult to shoot offhand unless you like heavy guns. It is also very nose heavy which makes it seem heavier than it is, but then again that nose heaviness helps shooting in a target stance. 

The central problem with the gun; it has almost too much power in .177. The recoil is quite significant and it is quite difficult to shoot it accurately without a good deal of practice and decent technique. The gun itself has great mechanical accuracy, but controlling it takes experience. The second major problem is the antiquated scope rail on the gun has no scope stop holes; pretty much all the Diana airguns of that period shared that problem, and you have to use either BKL mounts or one of the RWS mounts to mount your scope-- otherwise you will have scopes sliding. I think my airgun also needed droop correction-- that too was a Diana eccentricity that can make zeroing an infuriating exercise. 

It is a very good, high quality airgun but can be a bit difficult to like. But if your taste aligns with what the airgun is, you will not be disappointed. 

In any case at $200 it is a bargain and you should get it. If you don't like it I am pretty sure you can sell it on the Classified for $200 as long as the gun isn't abused. 


 
As stated by everyone else it's a well built, nicely finished and accurate gun. Well worth the asking price. It is heavy and does have a good amount of recoil. I shoot mine a model 52, same as 48 except for the stock, in .22 off of a bench so the weight means little. I love the gun it is such a nice shooter. It has a ratcheting anti-bear trap safety device so you won't get injured if you accidentally loose your grip on the cocking lever. Mine has the hole in the rail for a scope stop. I put the bullseye scope mounts on it to be sure my scope would last.

wNXpWV6.png

 
1572999590_1882549475dc211a66b12d9.28891075_82C91013-8A45-4B4A-BE01-395C8A2AE0D6.jpeg
1572999591_7933747445dc211a78182e8.08452520_6E7BB8A5-A9C3-4159-A884-3F5A0CB6A8AF.jpeg
I have about 500 pellets through mine and it’s just now starting to group really well. It had a lot to live up to as my other is a hw97k. I have the 22 caliber and shoot 18 gr. Jsb. Cheek piece is too low for good scope work. Imho. I added a riser much better now . I removed the rear site as I only scope shoot and would love to remove the front site and add a nice looking suppression can. If only for looks like the 97 has 
 
I recently got to try out a guys D52 that had been de-tuned to 14.5 FPE in .177 right after a FT match. 

First impression was it had a bit of weight to it, yet seemed to balance well off-hand. The shot cycle was unusually smooth and had that electric stapler smooth shot cycle. It only took one sight in shot before I was knocking down FT targets off- hand. I nearly made an offer on it right there, but the guy just bought it himself. It only had a little 2-7 scope on it, so with one of my heavy scopes it might be heavy.