I own both RAW and Red Wolf, both in .22 standard power, not HP. The RAW is a very robust, proven dependable platform, and its maker is a phone call away if you have a question or issue. He will make it well and it will shoot. Trigger is very good. The RW is my first electronic rifle. It is accurate, and with the power levels, offers some additional versatility. However, minor velocity adjustments are easy on the RAW with the spring adjustment. Without a programmer, you have the 3 power levels on the RW, but that's it. As it turns out, mine shoots the 18 grain well on High, and the 16 well on M, so I can't complain. Everyone except me raves about the RW trigger. Don't misunderstand, it is an excellent trigger. But, like everything else about the rifle, different from mechanical. It is not a sear breaking clean from a lever, but a pressure switch. It does not have the breaking glass rod, crisp feel of a really good mechanical trigger. But, it is repeatable, and adjustable over a wide range. My biggest complaint (call it an observation maybe), as a two-stage trigger, the first stage is pretty useless. I adjusted out the first stage, which allows a very good single stage trigger to be set up. One purpose of a good, two-stage trigger, is to spread the let off pressure as the shooter wants it, thus allowing a relatively heavy trigger to be very manageable by allowing a light additional pressure to break the second stage (ask any service rifle shooter). Can't do that with this trigger. It's first stage is light and kind of sloppy. But, the good news, you can get rid of it and have a good single stage trigger. Which rifle shoots better? Well, they both shoot better than I can shoot. My guess, if you shot groups from the bench with 10 randomly selected rifles of each model, the RAW rifles would display the better aggregate group size. Two very different, and interesting rifles. And, as Warren Page said, "only accurate rifles are interesting" (as mentioned below, this is incorrect, it was a Townsend Whelen quote).
