1565615020_6292575825d5163ac9424b7.92084111_A01382C0-ADBC-427A-BE7D-1F479702AD4E.jpeg
 I know this is only one 5 shot group but this is my best shooter to date. RAW 30 cal using JSB 50 5 shots at 100 
 
The gun was tuned by Ken Hicks. After shooting that group I went over to my permission and was tagging starlings at 67 yards off the top of the silo railings.

This is nothing compared to what others are doing but I think you walk before you run

now the down side to the 30 cal shooting 50 grains is there is a bit of a rainbow to the trajectory. I’m thinking a 22 or 25 slug gun would do better BUT I’m also concerned about high velocity slugs carrying further then I am comfortable with.

I expect to likely get into slugs but I’m keeping my powder dry for the moment. Seems the slug gun to have is the impact but I’m having trouble convincing myself I want a none traditional style gun. So I wait . 
 
I’d say keep the RAW. Don’t get caught up in all this “flat shooting” BS. If you’re zero’d at 50 yards with the 50.1 JSB, your drop is about 13 inches at 100 yards. If you get a gun shooting the 44.75 JSBs at 950 FPS, your drop is 11 inches. Not really worth it now is it?

I’ve been saying in here for years now that shooters get all excited about “flat shooters” when the reality is that no pellets shoot flat. And if you go higher than 950 FPS, you incur degraded wind performance, which is a proven FACT. If you’re going to shoot slugs at much greater distances it’s a different calculus...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Macros
I’d say keep the RAW. Don’t get caught up in all this “flat shooting” BS. If you’re zero’d at 50 yards with the 50.1 JSB, your drop is about 13 inches at 100 yards. If you get a gun shooting the 44.75 JSBs at 950 FPS, your drop is 11 inches. Not really worth it now is it?

I’ve been saying in here for years now that shooters get all excited about “flat shooters” when the reality is that no pellets shoot flat. And if you go higher than 950 FPS, you incur degraded wind performance, which is a proven FACT. If you’re going to shoot slugs at much greater distances it’s a different calculus...

I agree completely.
 
BB - That is some fine shooting and a fine rifle. Hard to beat a Theoben / RAW for simplicity and accuracy. Was at Roz's a few years ago when Martin came by to test his prototype for the.30. He was testing foe accuracy, and we were able to, consistently, hit a 2" spinner @ 100 yds. Remember telling him it was an interesting rifle - " but that will never catch on......DUH!

Dennis - Do you have the poly barrel in your .25?

THX to both for sharing.
 
The rear of it is pressed on. You can get it off though. I just did a whole bunch of modifications to mine. It’s a bit quieter but with a high pitch twaaang. I tried everything to make it quiet without the twang. No luck. I sealed ports, opened ports, used three different baffling materials, combined them, etc... couldn’t get rid of the twang. So strange. I’m going to have a shroud/moderator made for mine. Stoti
 
I’d say keep the RAW. Don’t get caught up in all this “flat shooting” BS. If you’re zero’d at 50 yards with the 50.1 JSB, your drop is about 13 inches at 100 yards. If you get a gun shooting the 44.75 JSBs at 950 FPS, your drop is 11 inches. Not really worth it now is it?

I’ve been saying in here for years now that shooters get all excited about “flat shooters” when the reality is that no pellets shoot flat. And if you go higher than 950 FPS, you incur degraded wind performance, which is a proven FACT. If you’re going to shoot slugs at much greater distances it’s a different calculus...

I have to chime in here and say this is dead on. As a old high power rifle shooter who transitioned from M-14’s to a rolling block BPCR 45/70 at the thousand the rainbow is true. You can shoot anything under rainbow once you learn where it is :)