The artillery hold is well touted when it comes to spring guns. For some models, it is the only way to come close to hitting anything, for others, not so much.
Today I found that my Daystate Wolverine shoots much better if the hold is tight vs. a loose artillery. PCP's do have a slight recoil as can be seen when viewing a shot through a scope mounted camera. That recoil, slight as it may be, could and does have a detrimental effect on where the shot lands. Keeping it in check seems to work best for me and my gun.
I am sure, in many cases, that when the shot broke, the cross hairs were perfectly on target, but the pellet may have landed 1/2 inch off at 40 yards. That all changed with a good snug grip and the gun tight against my shoulder. Not so tight as to introduce shake, but snug enough to counteract the mini recoil.
Anyone else find this to be true?
Today I found that my Daystate Wolverine shoots much better if the hold is tight vs. a loose artillery. PCP's do have a slight recoil as can be seen when viewing a shot through a scope mounted camera. That recoil, slight as it may be, could and does have a detrimental effect on where the shot lands. Keeping it in check seems to work best for me and my gun.
I am sure, in many cases, that when the shot broke, the cross hairs were perfectly on target, but the pellet may have landed 1/2 inch off at 40 yards. That all changed with a good snug grip and the gun tight against my shoulder. Not so tight as to introduce shake, but snug enough to counteract the mini recoil.
Anyone else find this to be true?