Well I am not either an expert, but I would believe a most would regard a ES difference from 1,9 fps to 1,3 fps insignificant. But I would guess the most important thing is if the accuracy improve or not, with shooting from the tin, or going true the process you describe. And you would know, as it after all is your gun and test
Edit: Did not read it right, see ES is 5 on both (exluding the first shoot)
Yeah, it's slightly more significant when you're talking SD vs ES, but I know what you're getting at. It's very possible that the improvement gained solely by prepping the pellets in my case is not significant. Visible improvement on paper in the form of numbers doesn't always translate to visible improvement on paper in the form of smaller groups. However, if you do two or three different things that provide this small amount of an improvement, it might show up in smaller group size. I was more trying to explain an approach to improving total result with variability reduction. It all comes down to how much improvement vs how much time it requires, and your own sense of worth when evaluating that improvement. However, I do think the people who consistently get slightly better results than most people are consistently paying slightly more attention to little details than most people.
Upvote 0