New Athlon Midas TAC FFP review

Joe, it’s amazing these companies can compete and survive. Btw, I’ve subscribed to your channel and have been going through your videos. I know I’m not alone when I say thanks for what your doing. 

I can’t wait to see the new video. I’m just hoping it’s got plenty of salty language to go along with the information, ? 
 
Boog, You might want to look at the previous version of the Athlon Midas 2.5-15 or 4.5-27, though it is variable zoom. I picked up a 2.5-15 for my springer and at the lower powers, I could clearly see under 6 yards. It is a very nice scope, hopefully it will hold up to my tuned HW97. The APLR1 reticle is awesome for HFT (0.2 mil gradations) - I had an Talos 4-14x44 BTR with the same reticle and it did well for me.

The Midas' are on sale now at Midway and other vendors ($339). I am trying a 4.5-27 one as well, hoping that the 30-yds min focus is only for the higher 27x zoom.
https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1094688103319/athlon-optics-midas-btr-rifle-scope-30mm-tube-45-27x-50mm-side-focus-illuminated-reticle-matte

Good luck --- picking the "right" scope is an adventure...
 
So, I picked up two Athlon Midas: 2.5-15x50 and 4.5-27x50. They are mighty clear scopes, but initially I was disappointed. The 2.5-15x50 I got from B&H for $389 was bright, but not very clear (maybe because the box got sooo very banged up). I could not clearly read the 10M targets numbers at 10-yards; my other Athon Talos/Argos scopes are much clearer. Anyway B&H indicated that it might be an optic alignment issued and replaced that one and it is much clearer, but I worry about the longevity on my tuned HW-97. Almost seems if the side focus might move after a shot - the polar opposite of the Talos and Argos scopes I have which are very stiff. The reticle, however, at 0.2 mi, is great for HFT.

The 4.5-27x50 was a big disappointment from Midway. It was on sale for $339 and again the box was severely beat up. This scope will not focus below 30 yards, unless on 4.5 power. I knew this going, but I was hoping that at 15x it would be just like the 2.5-15, unfortunately it wasn't. Even at longer distances I had trouble getting a good focus and had a good bit of purple fringing. It was very bright, but not so well refined. I had the scope less than 24 hrs and returned to Midway. I complained to Midway about the poor shipping, but still go dinged for return shipping. 

So, a cautionary tale. I might try the new versions of the Midas, as they look more crisp.
 
Anyone have the Midas TAC scope and the new Hawke FFP scope that they could compare?

From my research the Midas has HD glass - I'm sure the Hawke is good glass as well though.

I kind like the Hawke reticle a bit better - my plan is for HFT shooting.

Also - how does the Midas do for range finding? I would thing the sharper glass would help in that area...but I'm not sure.

Any thoughts/comments would be appreciated!

Eric
 
Hi. I bought a Midas Tac 6-24x50 to replace a Rudolph of the same magnification on my Steyr LG110 Hunting in .22, after many months of research and watching Joe’s excellent videos. 

Shot it in yesterday, zero’ed at 45m and then shot a group every 5m up and to 100m to establish my range card. By the way, the Steyr keeps amazing me. Shot two groups of less than 20mm at 100m. 

Today I went on a pest hunt. Shot more than 80 between 50m and 75m. The scope tracks beautifully. After dialing for 6 hours straight, not once did it not track correctly. 

What I really like is the following:

Clarity of the glass. I don’t have to see pigeons more clearly at 80m. It’s a better than the Rudolph and my Hawke Frontier. At this price point, it’s fantastic.

Turrets. The click properly, no mushy feel, nice and audible 

Zero stop. Oh goodness, what a nice feature. After each shot, I would dial back to 0 (set at 45m) without having to look at the scope. No more missing because I thought I had set it back to zero. My routine now after each shot has changed and it is way more consistent. 

Windage turret has a cap on. Many times my Rudolph’s windage turret would move without me noticing it. Slipping it in and out of the bag caused this sometimes and brushing up against my thick jacket. My focus was on the elevation turret and it often took a shot or two to realize the mistake. 

Center dot reticle. Got used to that with the Rudolph and is now a deal breaker if a scope does not offer this type of reticle. Personal choice though. 



All in in all, a great first outing.