My "TOP PICKS" for BIPODS!

Nice review Tom and my experience with the bi-pods that I have that you reviewed is the same. The Accu-Tac BR-4 G2 is my go to bi-pod that performs and is versatile enough for bench and field use. I did recently buy the Magpul to use as an light bi-pod for the air rifles that I sling and carry around. It is well made but the functioning of the legs is not very smooth and precise. I really bought it so when I want to un-sling my rifle and set it down to keep it off the ground like when sitting down to hunt grey squirrel. It is the light and well made bi-pod for that situation I was wanting. Bill
 
The Evo had the Carbon Fiber legs on it. 

I'm a little surprised to not hear from other shooters sharing their thoughts about which ones they think are the best and, just as important, why they think they are the best. 

I also feel obligated to mention the Caldwell Accu-max again. It was VERY close between that and the Recon! I'm trying to remember why I chose one over the other and I think it came down to just one very small detail. Either way would be a good choice as long as you understand about the forward/aft tilt issue. 

Cheers guys! 

Tom
 
I tested numerous bipods and found that there's really no "perfect" all arounder that fits both hunting and bench rest. I'd start with the low hanging fruit - BR, and say that hands down, the FC-G2 does the job. The legs are just too short for me from anywhere but a bench, so I have to swap in my SR5-G2 legs every now and then (especially when shooting off a mat at paper in uneven terrain).

In the PCP hunting category, I found that it gets pretty interesting (and tricky) finding a bipod that works well with bullpup and standard rifle form factors. Weight also enters the picture, and where this gets complicated is for situations such as mine - when I hunt in the woods / mountains, I may setup for a long range shot with my bipod on a tree stump, a big rock, fallen tree, or down hill - meaning that I need a great deal of length and stability.

With having that said, the Accu-Tacs are heavy, No question about that, they feel like a brick compared to an Atlas. The he tradeoff with the lighter Atlas bipods (using my BT47 PSR as the example), the legs flex/bend quite a but when fully extended. I do not like my bipod legs to flex, not saying they'll snap - but they can get a little scary. For this reason, the PSR is dedicated to my lighter PCP bullpup hunting rigs. All of my other hunting rifles get the SR5-G2, which is much less of a pain to operate than the Atlas.

So for me, it boils down to these three as my standard equipment, none of which overlap with the other for my specific use cases:

1578430635_16382127405e14f0ab1822f6.80336563_DCA45FEF-9664-4D3A-8125-AAFA9DB6EBD4.jpeg


PS - if you're in the market and have to choose between long or short, go long. You can buy extensions if you need them for some, but when you realize that your bipod is too short - you will regret going the shorter route!
 
Really good video Tom. I agree completely with your top pics in the higher end bipods. I have a PSR just because I’d like to have a bipod that’s got the pan feature if I need it. I also like that it’s lighter than the Accu-Tac for those long days in the field. As for the Accu-Tac, it’s my favorite all around small bipod as well. I’m an Accu-Tac guy. Their products are simply everything I want in a bipod and the tensioner lever is by far superior to the Atlas wheel design. Good job recommending the PSR over the V8. I don’t like the rotating legs on the V8 at all. See you at RMAC if we can get past this corona ordeal. I’m a huge fan of yours and I have learned a lot from you. Thanks for all your videos. 


Robert Hales