Magnum break barrels

Jump to latest Follow Reply

Attachments

  • 1581801400_5865039645e485fb818e7b6.54100054_1579028836_5850570585e1e1164254961.54903397_IMG_20...jpg
    1581801400_5865039645e485fb818e7b6.54100054_1579028836_5850570585e1e1164254961.54903397_IMG_20...jpg
    87.2 KB · Views: 11
Upvote 0
I did a deep search on the internet. Geeky computer guy me. And the highest documentation on muzzle velocity i could find is 28lbs. So after hours of research I believe you are wrong on this. Unless you can prove otherwise. The rifle was a fluke and a failure. Or they would have produced more and they would still be in production.


 
Upvote 0
I did a deep search on the internet. Geeky computer guy me. And the highest documentation on muzzle velocity i could find is 28lbs. So after hours of research I believe you are wrong on this. Unless you can prove otherwise. The rifle was a fluke and a failure. Or they would have produced more and they would still be in production.

Click to expand...

Question for you. Why did you delete the chronograph data you posted in the first page of this topic ?
 
Upvote 0
Seems you are a lousy Geek, if you looked hard enough you should find my review from years back and you can even find the info at an old Theoben sight several times over. Sounds like you just can't handle the fact the Dual Magnums are King past and present.

But since you need proof of it and can't do proper research and since I own 2 and have confirmed the 36fpe and exceeded it getting a max of 38fpe...

As far as a fluke it sure was and nothing to this day can match the power or flexibility of 2 power levels in one rifle. As far as a failure many couldn't afford it and being way over the 12fpe level in the UK which is was made caused poor sales. 

1581811993_20623286735e488919b79ba0.61086506_445 Dual Magnum instructions.JPG


1581812922_428527095e488cba5f94d0.23073876_Dual Magnum instructions.jpg

 
Upvote 0
It is a factory pamphlet proves nothing. All companies inflate their fps and muzzle energy. They are a very nice rifle and I wish I had one. But facts are facts. I actually know where one is if I had $1500 I would buy it in a minute. I would be a nice addition to my Magnum collection. Have eight. It is one of the other three I want. These are still very good stats for the rifle. But not even close to the 36 they claim. 
1581816750_14747833725e489bae4e15d0.18340884_20200215_172330.jpg

 
  • Like
Reactions: sonny
Upvote 0
So if factory claims mean nothing and are inflated it should then be said the 150 does not make 34fpe it makes less, right? Secondly the chrony charts you posted are for the Eliminator (it says so right on it, third line above the .25 #'s) Dual Magnum's never came in .20 or .25 your deep internet search should have shown that too. The Dual Magnum easily exceeds the Eliminator/Crow Magnum by over 100+fps so again lousy research you're looking at and talking about a totally different rifle! 😂 You also never answered why you took down your original fps claims which worked out to 44fpe for the 150, another mistake it seems...
 
Upvote 0
So if factory claims mean nothing and are inflated it should then be said the 150 does not make 34fpe it makes less, right? Secondly the chrony charts you posted are for the Eliminator (it says so right on it, third line above the .25 #'s) Dual Magnum's never came in .20 or .25 your deep internet search should have shown that too. The Dual Magnum easily exceeds the Eliminator/Crow Magnum by over 100+fps so again lousy research you're looking at and talking about a totally different rifle! 
1f602.svg
You also never answered why you took down your original fps claims which worked out to 44fpe for the 150, another mistake it seems...
Click to expand...

Have information on every Beeman & Theoben ever made if you want me to post it. But I won't waste my time. The Hatsan was brand new out of the box and was diesling. It has settled to around 840. I deleted the post because you immediately started trolling. 

Done arguing about something I'm right about. And done with being trolled.
 
Upvote 0
Sure post away on the Dual Magnum info, if you have it you should see the numbers I mentioned. You have been talking about and posting numbers on the Eliminator not even the Dual Magnums, 2 totally different rifles! As far as trolling, you see me stating facts as trolling? Your claims were way off the mark and I mentioned it. You call it trolling I call it the truth. I posted facts, manuals and actual numbers on rifles I personally own and you basically say I'm lying...
 
Upvote 0
In the images shared above (thank you) -- What caused the SuperDome in .22 to accelerate 132 FPS from 25 to 50 yards yet drop in energy? This is not a baited question but a legitimate respectful ask. Thank you in advance.

Click to expand...

If you look at a lot of the old Straightshooters "our take" data, you'll find what look like transcription errors in the numbers more than occasionally. In this case, 788 was almost certainly 488, which works out to just under the 8 foot pounds of energy shown (and consider the "7" is directly above the "4" on a ten-key pad.)
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Resources
Menu