JSB 44.75 grain (4 tins sorted by weight)

this is about rite about 2 gr difference , I usually in winter sort my pellets and slugs , a case at a time , I found better accuracy , However many say 2 grs wont matter much with a pellet that weighs 44 gr , but weather they are a bit more accurate or I am a bit more confident , I still do it I do wash off first then lightly lube and repackage them , I make the prime ones I call match grade like all exactly 44.5 for these then I got like 43to 44 gr they are labeled light , and over 45 named heavy and the others are sorted by .2 grains so i get about 6 different sized tins , If I do say a case of ammo , but in the 30 cal I use 20 tins as they dont have 500 like the 22 cal or 350 for the 25 caliber ,

I still have alot of use for pellets but in the 30 caliber range slugs are about the same price , but I my self use slugs where I have alot of open space as they carry much further .



SO what is your reason for posting each weight to show difference or you sort like I said for constancy ?

LOU
 
I sort primarily to see what I have and to know there are no odd balls I'll grab. It's just part of being as precise as I can. I have shot strings sorted in .30 grain increments and found those strings consistent, so I sort them in .20 grain increments to allow for errors. It's just comforting to know when I grab a tin that they are all within .20 grains of each other instead of wondering if the flyer was a dud pellet weight. I haven't taken them any further yet with washing or sizing as they are clean already and have a slick finish of an oily wax feel. I may try and lube some to see if I get any different results. These pellets and the Impact are all new in just this week to me. I just thought I'd share my results for others to ponder as well.
 
Yea the UI on the original graphic is rough on the eyes, I have the same issues building my uis with overwhelming amounts of data. The second graph does a good job of consolidating all the data into a nice visual.



Seems JSB's heavier variety of pellets step away from QC, 2 grain difference (nearly 5%) is a bit outside what I would call acceptable, and likewise with 33.95's (I got 1.5 gr at nearly 5% as well) is equally unacceptable. It would be nice if they had a way to sort and keep all the weights within 2-3% gr of each other...but if it came at much cost, then I'd rather sort/weigh them myself as its quite a relaxing process anyhow.
 
Yea the UI on the original graphic is rough on the eyes, I have the same issues building my uis with overwhelming amounts of data. The second graph does a good job of consolidating all the data into a nice visual.



Seems JSB's heavier variety of pellets step away from QC, 2 grain difference (nearly 5%) is a bit outside what I would call acceptable, and likewise with 33.95's (I got 1.5 gr at nearly 5% as well) is equally unacceptable. It would be nice if they had a way to sort and keep all the weights within 2-3% gr of each other...but if it came at much cost, then I'd rather sort/weigh them myself as its quite a relaxing process anyhow.

I guess you and I are both detailed oriented type folks. The detailed spreadsheet really does give the finer details of the sort, but does take a little more time to weed through. If you look at the spreads without the four 43.xx included, you see a much better spread result. The sort is required to eliminate those though, and is why I sort them.
 
Yea the UI on the original graphic is rough on the eyes, I have the same issues building my uis with overwhelming amounts of data. The second graph does a good job of consolidating all the data into a nice visual.



Seems JSB's heavier variety of pellets step away from QC, 2 grain difference (nearly 5%) is a bit outside what I would call acceptable, and likewise with 33.95's (I got 1.5 gr at nearly 5% as well) is equally unacceptable. It would be nice if they had a way to sort and keep all the weights within 2-3% gr of each other...but if it came at much cost, then I'd rather sort/weigh them myself as its quite a relaxing process anyhow.

I guess you and I are both detailed oriented type folks. The detailed spreadsheet really does give the finer details of the sort, but does take a little more time to weed through. If you look at the spreads without the four 43.xx included, you see a much better spread result. The sort is required to eliminate those though, and is why I sort them.



I concur. I personally sort into 2 groups, within 1.5% gr under, and within 1.5% gr over advertised, which at worse cuts my es down by half. The outliers I discard for tuning. When I sorted the 33.95's, I had 33.4-33.98 gr in one group and 33.99-34.5 in another.