I am specifically referring the above question regarding those who are considering purchasing an Air Venturi Avenger. If a prospective buyer is thinking of hunting something the size of a groundhog (aka woodchuck) out to 100 yards or better, then having the rifle tuned for heavier pellets or slugs is what they would want. My question is, which filling option would be best for getting as many power tunes as possible? Can the large scba 4,500 psi tank give multiple "power" tunes, or would the ability to fill to 4,500 psi be quickly diminished after the first couple of fills? Or, since the regulator and hammer spring are set for power, is it only a case of getting fewer full power shots with each fill before going off the regulator? I really would like to fill with a scba tank, rather than get into having to use the more expensive and involved compressors available. Of course, one fill from the tank would give more shots than would likely be afforded while hunting. So, I wouldn't necessarily need to go back to my vehicle and hook up the compressor to the battery. Returning to the vehicle and filling from a tank would be must quicker, quieter, and easier. I am just trying to get a handle on what it really means to have a rifle that can be charged to 4,350 psi. Is it really better to have a rifle that takes, say, a 250 bar fill? Would such a rifle afford more "power" fills from the type of tank I have mentioned? Thank you for your advice in clearing my thinking regarding the implications of filling a 300 bar rifle from a tank.