I'm not impressed with 1 inch groups at 100 yards

When measuring (and reporting, or bragging) about our shooting performance, maybe we should get a little away from the "My smallest 5-shot group was X moa (or Y inches at Z yards)."

en

Instread, we might consider:

"I consistently shoot X moa groups (or Y inch groups at Z yards)."





Something like this:

"I get about 4 out of 5 groups with 0.7" at 50y."

Or: "4 out of 10 of my groups are 1 moa or less at 100y. And 7 of 10 groups are 1.5 moa."



Just my 2 cents (or really my 10 cents to cover my own groups at 25 yards, consistently...).

Matthias

When measuring (and reporting, or bragging) about our shooting performance, maybe we should get a little away from the "My smallest 5-shot group was X moa (or Y inches at Z yards)."

en

Instread, we might consider:

"I consistently shoot X moa groups (or Y inch groups at Z yards)."





Something like this:

"I get about 4 out of 5 groups with 0.7" at 50y."

Or: "4 out of 10 of my groups are 1 moa or less at 100y. And 7 of 10 groups are 1.5 moa."



Just my 2 cents (or really my 10 cents to cover my own groups at 25 yards, consistently...).

Matthias

Click to expand...

I love it Matthias....well except.....none of my groups out of 10 have been 1 moa or less! LOL.....I'll get there one day ...one out of a hundred maybe?



Fuss