how is it achieved in the RW when with every shot the pressure in the bottle changes?
RW is unregulated so the tank pressure is directly pushing on the valve. The, for example, FX Impact has a regulator between the valve and the tank so there is a constant pressure on the valve
Every shot from both the red wolf, the fx guns, and every other PCP, changes the pressure in the air reservoir. The only regulated air is the air in the plenum, downstream of the air reservoir and upstream of the transfer port into the barrel. So, the air pressure in the reservoir changes after each shot so the plenum can be refilled.
The red wolf is neither a traditional non-regulated gun (like a Disco) or a traditionally regulated gun like an Impact. It is an ELECTRONICALLY regulated gun. The board/programming is doing the regulating. All three types require air from somewhere though, that somewhere is the air reservoir, which does indeed change pressure with each shot. That's that pesky little laws of physics thing I was referring to.
The underlying theme between all of the Impact/Red wolf or FX/Daystate arguments (and what feels like a good majority of the posts on airgun nation) is, which is better?
The "which is better" question is one posed by the manufacturers just as much as any of us. They're fighting for our business ($$$) and really want us to think theirs is "better." Is a gun with a traditional regulator better than a. electronically regulated gun? Who knows.
The "which is better" inevitably leads to the next question, " which one do I want to shoot in a competition where big bucks and bragging rights are at stake." It's funny how after these big product showcases, err "competitions," we see a sell-off of whatever didn't finish at the top. Happened last year with EBR and seems to be happening again this year with RMAC.
What I feel is missed in these soul-searching introspections about what we are going to shoot in a competition, is the simple fact that the person spending the most time shooting their gun in ways that constitute meaningful practice, is the person most likely to win. Now, does making your living off the creation of shooting videos on YouTube, and/or being an employee of AOA, Utah Airguns, FX, Daystate, etc. put you at an advantage over the rest of us that have 40hr/week non-shooting clock in/clock out jobs, you betcha. I'm not putting them down at all, they put in the time and spent the whole year shooting.
The best chance for a guy to beat one of the YouTubers/manufacturer employees is not to agonize over which gun (brand) you're shooting, but, rather to spend a whole lotta time shooting what they know to be an accurate gun. That means lots of money invested in pellets and a very understanding wife, or no wife.