Got 60FPE out of my Royale!

"mubhaur"I believe you Glem.
But I am unable to understand that why Johan says that it is not doable.
Further I would like to know the specs of your hammer weight and TP.
I tried a bit heavy hammer weight but of no use.
regards 
Umair Bhaur
Yeah that is strange, maybe a liability thing?

Anyways I took it apart a bit and got some measurements for you, I don't have a scale so measurements will have to do.

Hammer weight
44b9deb0a8fad825921d8b3097fe8417.jpg

51c14a5d133a175c9e46e5d617f87a52.jpg

Spring is uncompressed just enough to stay in there.
89282bc2ddb3cc6d7bfbcbf63fabc454.jpg


This is the depth of HST adjustment, just the hex nut in there bottomed out.
82edd694366d48c56390880a32ad62b8.jpg


Hammer length, the diameter has to be the same as any other using this block. (I would imagine)
fb3159afd8a1869ba8be14adf39cea43.jpg


TP on the barrel, tough to measure. I tried sliding some plumbers putty where the barrel goes and take a mold of the TP in the block but was unable to do it well. 
d4a3a6a179e8e3c3e16ff084b289998c.jpg
 
"mubhaur"
46968e0b12daea7555ef14592f80ceb2.jpg

these are the specs of hammer weight of my Royal 500
@ Mubhaur - Samsung S8? If so I have the same, anyways does it look identical to my stuff? Keep in mind the top picture the numbers are off, looks to be around 37mm long. Should be some visual differences that can be noticed if it is. I thought you said adding weight to the hammer didn't help? It didn't really for me and I didn't like the sound it made even with the HST adjusted very light. How about the amount I can adjust the HST or the size of the TP on the barrel? Yours started life as non-regulated so maybe there's some other minor difference we're missing. (as far as I can remember)

@Jimmy - Thanks and yeah it is a lovely platform, I couldn't be happier with it about 6000 pellets through it and the only o-ring I've replaced is the regulator one with having it in and out so many times. 

@Chuck - Yeah! The more the merrier, the prices are coming down for them now too. I got mine for 1450US with the case up here in Canada literally a day or two after the prices came down and made the laminate with case cheaper than the walnut without one.
 
"Glem.Chally"
"mubhaur"
46968e0b12daea7555ef14592f80ceb2.jpg

these are the specs of hammer weight of my Royal 500
@ Mubhaur - Samsung S8? If so I have the same, anyways does it look identical to my stuff? Keep in mind the top picture the numbers are off, looks to be around 37mm long. Should be some visual differences that can be noticed if it is. I thought you said adding weight to the hammer didn't help? It didn't really for me and I didn't like the sound it made even with the HST adjusted very light. How about the amount I can adjust the HST or the size of the TP on the barrel? Yours started life as non-regulated so maybe there's some other minor difference we're missing. (as far as I can remember)
@Jimmy - Thanks and yeah it is a lovely platform, I couldn't be happier with it about 6000 pellets through it and the only o-ring I've replaced is the regulator one with having it in and out so many times. 
@Chuck - Yeah! The more the merrier, the prices are coming down for them now too. I got mine for 1450US with the case up here in Canada literally a day or two after the prices came down and made the laminate with case cheaper than the walnut without one.
I got the same parts that used in factory regulated royale 500 from fx Sweden.
These include bigger valve, valve seat, bigger transfer port.
I will measure the TP hole.
it appears that there are some more difference between yours and mine.
that has to be digged out.
 
Hang in there mubhauer... by the time you're finished you're going to know everything there is to know about tuning that Royal 500 to absolute perfection. But she is going to make you pay dearly for the privilege of giving up her secrets. But I believe it's going to be the beginning of a long love affair between you and that Royal of yours! :)
 
"CHUCK"Hang in there mubhauer... by the time you're finished you're going to know everything there is to know about tuning that Royal 500 to absolute perfection. But she is going to make you pay dearly for the privilege of giving up her secrets. But I believe it's going to be the beginning of a long love affair between you and that Royal of yours! :)
4793988c40046eeba102c3955893dd20.jpg
2d7dabb0d60a595e738dcae681b2e131.jpg
591bbcb646098a14262666d30481358e.jpg
f84f2eae8a3111f245de295504ba4b3a.jpg
e1691470b20e96ed71269ea0ec1dc59f.jpg
33a2fdfac77068b04d76e0a8549e6b6f.jpg
c3b0c6bd55d12700dcf0e08e7953eeb6.jpg
bfc71bc8c1f4ef59d7f272d5f9933ae4.jpg


with these specs of parts the maximum I cancan get is 950fps using 25 grain jsb in my Royale 500.

To me the only difference is that the hammer weight / guide of HIS gun is shorter than mine. This short length may allow him to compress the hammer spring a bit more. A bit more HST. 
 
As I was reading this thread and looking at the photos I thought I should share with you my experience with chrony measurements etc.
I own a M1 Shooting Chrony for 3-4 years. A while ago I realized that my air guns had many ups and downs regarding velocity. The guns were not inconsistent but once I measured for example my CZ 200 consistent at 12 foot-pounds and the next weekend I got consistent 14 foot-pounds of energy. I started not to trust the measurements I was getting. I knew (many say so) that chrony measurements are affected by light conditions but how much? So I bought myself a second chronograph. This one is An Air Chrony MK3 and measures velocities regardless of light conditions. Now which one to trust? I had to make a comparison…
So I went back to my basement and put them side by side (the correct is in line) for testing. Conditions the same for both. Distance between them 20 cm. Air Chrony MK3 in front, M1 Shooting Chrony behind. Gun for the test CZ 200 S regulated approx. 14 foot-pounds.
Now the results...
3660ccc1d8a480d111d109951fefea75.jpg

Shooting chrony without any cover

176ec3c6fda4798e7e8389f40be7b8dd.jpg

Shooting chrony with cover

First test without any cover. The chronies exposed directly to light (not fluorescent)
I took 5 shots at about 875 fps (Air Chrony MK3). The average velocity measured by the Shooting Chrony was 47 fps higher, with the max difference climbing at 55 fps and the lowest at 37 fps. That’s a lot…

Second test with Shooting Chrony M1 covered with a plastic sheet and some white paper. It’s easier than using the shields and has the same results.
5 shots again, same velocity for Air Chrony MK3. The average velocity measured by the Shooting Chrony was 1,5 fps lower, with the max difference being 3 fps and the lowest 0,7 fps. That seems o.k.

My conclusion: A Shooting Crony should be in a shadow to produce reliable results. That again is not a general rule just my opinion from my chrony.
So my advice from my own experience...
Glem, use the shields when you measure velocities with the Shooting Chrony just to compare the results you are getting.
Umair, your rifle shoots 25 grain JSB pellets at 950 fps. It should shoot the Heavies at around 850 fps (mine shoots the heavies approx. 100 fps slower than the 25 grain) That’s approx. 55 foot-pounds. You are reaching the upper limit. “Weatherby”, who is the most experienced from us all, wrote: “I’ve modified quite a few and in general, around 56 FPE was the average obtained power.” So again, I think you are o.k. There aren’t many fps hidden, maybe just a few. Tune your rifle for accuracy and shot count and enjoy it. It’s a wonderful air gun. Mine is an ELITE 400 barreled to .25 and shoots the heavies at 790 fps. It’s one hole at 60 meters. Only modifications are a Huma regulator at 150 bar, transfer port drilled from 4,5 to 5 mm and valve seat opened with fine sand paper at aproxx. 4.5 mm. Hammer spring adjuster all the way out.
But again, that’s my opinion.
Sorry for the long post.
 
Ok I've used the shields and taken some shots, with 190BAR in the bottle I'm getting similar results actually a bit higher 910-920 with the MKII's. This is the same chrony that read about 100 fps less when I first got the gun. (Prior to raising reg to 160 and tightening the HST)

It only reads about 1 out of every 2 shots (when shooting inside) with the shields on so that's the reason I usually leave them off.

Edit * Another thing I thought of that my gun has that Weatherby, Mubhaur, Costa or anyone else besides us in Canada have is an unshrouded barrel. Unlikely but it's one difference that I can think of thats obvious. Maybe the shroud saps a bit of power? Just an observation.
 
Glad your chrony works fine Glem. Now we have to continue the search for more fps (not all of us of course)
About the shroud. I have removed it and I’m using a Weihrauch silencer. Although it feels that you hit the target harder and faster and there is a POI shift when not using the silencer, the velocity remains the same. I remember measuring it once.
Another thing that came to my mind is the hammer spring. I bought three of them by mistake when I ordered some spare parts from FX a while ago. All three had the same looks and length but one of then felt a little harder when finger pressed. This is the one I’m using and probably that’s why the “all the way out” for the hammer spring adjuster. I never had so little spring preload before. But for my gun without a bigger valve, increasing hammer spring preload just wastes lots of air while velocity gain is relatively small.
Of course I don’t recommend buying and testing all available FX hammer springs but a fresh one never hurt anyone.
 
Hey Glem! Man I liked watching that little video a lot bro! I've been very sick for the last couple weeks, and with work and that I haven't had a chance to do any shooting for over a month! Just hearing the sound of you video got me excited again to go shooting. All that power is nothing without accuracy, and for me one hole accuracy was cool for awhile, but once I achieved that I did the same as you...I went for the accuracy and the power. I have some really heavy duty spinners and I enjoy not just seeing, but hearing that loud Smack! when a 34 grainer flattens itself out like a pancake at 55 or 58 ft lbs is something I just never get tired of. Now I really got house-a-tosis!
Thanks, Chuck
 
By the way, I read what you guys were doing with you chrono lights and if I am not out of place I would like to tell you about the indoor lights on mine. I have the Caldwell Chronograph - https://www.midwayusa.com/product/628006/caldwell-ballistic-precision-chronograph-premium-kit - and it has infra-red lights that are supposed to give the best readings indoors according to what I have been told. And you used to be able to buy just the light kit on Amazon - https://www.amazon.com/Caldwell-721111-Chronograph-Light-Kit/dp/B00HX46M0I - just thought I would mention it. The kit comes with a 110 volt power cord and a battery pack that takes 4 AA batteries in case you don't have access to power in some situation. Works great for me...and you may like it too!
All the best, Chuck
 
"CHUCK"Hey Glem! Man I liked watching that little video a lot bro! I've been very sick for the last couple weeks, and with work and that I haven't had a chance to do any shooting for over a month! Just hearing the sound of you video got me excited again to go shooting. All that power is nothing without accuracy, and for me one hole accuracy was cool for awhile, but once I achieved that I did the same as you...I went for the accuracy and the power. I have some really heavy duty spinners and I enjoy not just seeing, but hearing that loud Smack! when a 34 grainer flattens itself out like a pancake at 55 or 58 ft lbs is something I just never get tired of. Now I really got house-a-tosis!
Thanks, Chuck
Glad you enjoyed it Chuck,

The range officer girl came up to me the other day and asked if the pellets go through the plastic placards that hold targets up. You can see them in the video, "uhh yeah" haha. Even at 200m I can see pieces of the 1"x4"s fly out the back if I hit them, still has around 19ftlb at that distance. 

Anyways here's a couple pics of the beating I layed on them, I basically need to fix them after every time shooting them. Just bend them straightish and tighten up the nuts at the back side from the added steel I put on the front.

As for the chrony lights, yeah that is a great option. Mine seems to work fine inside if I keep the shields off, and similar results for me with or without them. Other than working better without the shields inside for my lighting in here.

Thanks again,

faa9a938e5ac89eaf3d33319d7ae3699.jpg

9f14b299f8e44a4bb75f6e55e9475566.jpg

dace929475f1404a9c0f0819104f41ae.jpg
 
Oh I love those pictures! Reminds me of the rabbit and crow my buddy gave that were meant for 12 ft lb field target practice...hee hee! I guess you can imagine how badly I beat them to death! hee hee hee! My spinners are much thicker than those you show me...I will take a picture of them next time I go shooting. And that will be soon! I stubbornly waited until today to go the doctor like an idiot waiting and waiting to get better! I got sick with the flu/bronchitis on Jan. 22nd, and my back hurt like a knife in it on top of that...guess I strained it moving my big extension ladders around the big 2 story house on my last paint job. I am used to just picking them up and walking them where I want them to go but now think at 62 my back is telling me to let my younger guys do that part. Anyway, the doc gave me something for the pain and a new regimen of back exercises to start when I get better. The worst part is not being able to go shooting...the weather is perfect right now here...about 84 degrees and bluebird skies...and I got cabin fever bad. Maybe by tomorrow or Friday I will be able to go smash my spinners too! I will take pictures! 
All the best, Chuck
 
I got the same parts that used in factory regulated royale 500 from fx Sweden.These include bigger valve, valve seat, bigger transfer port.
I will measure the TP hole.
it appears that there are some more difference between yours and mine.
that has to be digged out.
Hey Umair,

Do you still have the M5 stock mounting boss? Where the boss is that connects your stock to the action where it threads into the action is it a M5 or M6 thread?

Just found out this is another difference between low power and high power factory Royales. This might be the missing piece of the puzzle. I have also bored the ID of the threaded part that goes into the action a bit, the way you see there's also a side port in the threaded section also bored out by me. This is after my initial results however and my measurement shown here is the high power version which is why I ask. You might still have the low power version.
557a8139c09f3099a738f13b810fa703.jpg

1650ac2118d3ff7468d114e2ab43c99a.jpg