Fx wildcat Weaver/Picatinny rail set

Unit Manufacturing Cost .... much more machining time (thus increased cost) required to mill out the PRail vs cutting two small dove tails. I guessing that FX, made that decision in the interest of a lower UMC ... thereby allowing FX to offer the WC at a lower cost to end user. Additional benefit might also be reduced weight ... IMHO
For the record, give a choice, I would opt for the PRail vs dovetail ever time.
 
Aaauuuhhh, we touched on a important subject. All my other air guns have it. And there in the same cost range as fx. Matter of fact, the more I think of this there behind the curve on this subject. To be honest, if fx could find a way to get the sp barrel to NOT BE PELLET fussy , and get to the Prail. They would be no doubt the best air gun maker in the world. Because they have everything else. That's for sure. Sorry guys got a little side tracked. I have an Edgun, Vulcan, and my wonderfull Cricket. All have the Prail and it makes for a very easy on /off when switching back an for between scopes. Another reason I believe they don't want to come around with there Prail is the NO LIMIT MOUNTS made for there airguns. They are set up to buy all there accessaries from them. But at there asking price, which I believe is to high , it just don't make sence. Anyway this is turning into a rant, sorry guys. That's my take....Steve 
 
Personally I like having the interchangeability with firearm hardware. Just nice to have a standard scope/accessory mount system. With picatinny you can take a scope rings and all off say your ar15 and drop it on your Wildcat and just re zero without removing the rings from the scope. Its just a more modern and versitile system. Plus I think it looks cool and that's worth a lot to me.
Additionally if used on springers it would eliminate scope ring creep once and for all.
 
I kinda figured that people liked them because they can swap scopes easier and such. I am just used to weaver on centerfire and dovetails on rimfires and airguns. I don't swap scopes and never had any issues with dovetail mounts, so I wondered what the reasoning was for such a push to weaver. Weaver tending to be a more bulky base and ring setup and tending to weigh more just never made sense to me on a pcp air rifle with little to no recoil. I agree with switching to weaver/pic for springers, but that is about it.
 
I think dovetail/picatinny rail also is a bit of an cultural differences between USA and Europe.
Most of the airgun manufacturers in Europes default option is dovetail. I have actually heard that some swedes said that they would not buy Bobcat or Wildcat guns because they have a "tactical" look with it's black composite stock, pistol grip, rail and so on.
In my opinion, use what works for you and what you enjoy :)
That said I will switch out the dovetail on my Waildcat, and it will be the first time I will be using picatinny for a scope mount.
About the pellet fussiness, I can not agree. My Wildcat gladly eats JSB Jumbo and Jumbo Heavy, as well as FX on in 5,52 mm and Preditor Pollymag Short as well. I have Steyr Hunting in .177 that only works well with AirArms Field 4,51 and nothing else.
on the other hand I hade a CZ 200T in .177 that ate almost anything.
For me the FX ST barrel works fine, and since the JSB brand is a common brand in Sweden I have no problems getting the best out of gun.
 
imagejpeg

Here is the rail :)