FX Wildcat Mk II .25 Cal BC Shootout - 4 pellets, 1 slug (updated)

In follow up to a previous post I made, comparing the measured BC's for two of the most popular pellets for the FX Wildcat, I went ahead today and retested the pellets, expanded the lineup tested, and used my new chronograph. Below are the details...

Some of you may be familiar with a couple of my posts that I've done testing the BC's for several pellets for my gun (RAW HM1000x) in .25 and .30 caliber. Well, I finally got my son his 'dream gun', and worked past all the initial issues (Gun is a FX Wildcat, Mk II in .25 cal). The gun has a Huma reg installed, the HS has been cleaned up to allow adjustments, a DonnyFL Sumo mod is installed and the gun has been tuned to shoot the JSB Heavies at @ 840 fps. Here's his gun:



1536973915_2120298885b9c5c5b905ff4.18121295_IMG_5192.JPG
 
1537663118_2478016285ba6e08ef21900.34550067_IMG_5254.JPG
1537663119_19082917555ba6e08fb30d77.16421832_IMG_5249.JPG
1537663120_13105074845ba6e090743115.78625983_IMG_5246.JPG


Today I had the house to myself, so I got out the gun and set out to map the BC's of the several common pellets he'll shoot, as well as trying to capture the BC's on two Ratsniper slugs. The pellets tested are shown in the top row below, and include the following: the JSB Lite (25.4 grain), JSB Heavy, Mk II (33.95 grain), H&N Baracudas (31.02 grain), H&N Baracuda Hunter Extremes (28.40 grain) pellets, and the Ratsniper slug (36.0 grain). All were shot through the stock barrel liner that comes with the FX WC, Mk .25 cal (perhaps one of you can fill me in on which variant that is?). All pellets were not measured and were taken straight out of the tin without sorting for weight. No sorting for head sizes was complete either-so accuracy and variability are what you will typically experience shooting straight out of the tin.

1537663740_20200920735ba6e2fc182a50.73403137_IMG_5258.JPG


Muzzle velocity, near was taken with the rear window of the chrony at 1 yard (3') from the tip of the moderator. Distance to far measurement, was taken with the rear window of the chrony at 50 yard from the tip of the moderator Delta (distance) between locations: 49 yards (measured with a Nikon laser rangefinder with angle compensation). The closest Chronograph is a Caldwell Ballistic Precision Premium Kit (includes the lights and tripod) that includes a cord to plug directly into the headphone port of a smartphone and record the data automatically. The newer chronograph (just arrived yesterday so I can do this testing for ya'll) is a Caldwell G2 Ballistic Precision which has a bluetooth connection to any smartphone for automatic recording of data (sweet!).

Here's a photo of the near Chrony setup:

Setup​ @ 1 yard: 

1537663583_506433285ba6e25f800fb9.85034101_IMG_5240.JPG
1537663809_13691517035ba6e341ab2206.47188021_IMG_5241.JPG




Setup at the target (@ 50 yards, a 49 yard delta): Caldwell G2 Chronograph with Bluetooth link to iPad for data recording



1537663584_15057072875ba6e260403c59.55627162_IMG_5251.JPG
 
1537663967_2546613975ba6e3dfe99a37.84776565_IMG_5250.JPG




I opened up Chairgun (Mac version) and adjusted the environmental conditions, altitude, etc. I then went to the BC calculator app, plugged in the data, and calculated the following results (below).

The weather today was beautiful: average temp today was 68F, with low winds (7 mph out of the SE, which is a slight tail wind), 50% Humidity, pressure at 30.27 in Hg.

Tested gun: FX Wildcat Mk II in .25 caliber with Huma reg installed, HS tension adjusted, stock barrel liner. DonnyFL Sumo Installed. Tuned to shoot Mk II heavies around 840 fps.

Test notes: Two different Chronographs were used (they have been carefully compared to find the offset in velocity readings between the two): the 1 yard chrony used is the 'Caldwell Ballistic Precision' Chronograph with the data link to the iPhone app to automatically record the shot data. The 50 yard chrony used is the newer Caldwell Chrony: Caldwell G2 Ballistic Precision which has a bluetooth connection to any smartphone for automatic recording of data-making my life MUCH easier for gathering the data. The offset between my two chrony's has been determined through painstaking testing to be 'Caldwell (Corded) Velocity = Caldwell G2 Velocity + 3.63 fps' (in other words: you have to add 3.63 fps to the G2 to equal the velocity measured by the Caldwell corded unit). These two distances have become my standard for recording BC data for airguns as the 1 yard 'muzzle' distance allows most of the exit dynamics to settle down and the 50 yard gives a good indication of typical target distances at longer range for which the guns will be used.

Velocity data is shown below for each pellet tested.

Shooter today is me... 



For this comparison, I used data for 12 shots of teach pellet. I set off to capture the BC's from the two Ratsniper slugs, but had trouble getting them to record at 50 yards (I later realized the POI was shifted laterally and it was missing the chrony at 50 yards). I did map the velocities, shot by shot, in groupings, then averaged the bunch from both locations to use as inputs to calculate the BC's using Chairgun.

[Note: for those inclined to ask: yes, I have done it the other way in the past mapping the BC-shot by shot-since I have the data for a single pellet across both chronies. What I end up getting is a chart that shows some variability in the BC results and, when averaged, end up matching the results of simply averaging the data from the near chrony, averaging the data from the far chrony, and then using those two velocities with the delta distance to calculate the BC. They end up being the same either way...]



First up: JSB lites (25.39 grn):

1537664471_18916978365ba6e5d761cf26.19277860_FX WC .25 Cal JSB Lite BC-092218.jpg


Shot group:

(Picture may be added later)



Next up: JSB Heavy, Mk II (33.95 grn):

1537664488_15274330905ba6e5e80b9fc5.29344215_FX WC .25 Cal JSB Hvy Mk II BC-092218.jpg


Shot group:

(Picture may be added later)

Next: H&N Baracuda's (31.02 grn):

1537664535_1417358525ba6e617829c35.15020581_FX WC .25 Cal H&N Baracuda BC-092218.jpg


Shot group:

(Picture may be added later)

Next: H&N Baracuda Hunter Extremes (28.40 grn):

1537664569_7649716695ba6e63997a2b0.98640110_FX WC .25 Cal H&N Baracuda Hunter Extreme BC-092218.jpg


Shot group:

(Picture may be added later)

Lastly, I did manage to get one, single shot to register across both chronies for the 36 grain slugs...

Last: Ratsniper Slug (36 grn): (yep, that's NOT a typo-they have crazy high BC's! Same slug in my RAW HM1000x with polygon barrel comes in at 0.0888!).

1537664629_5517224245ba6e6750089d4.30758777_FX WC .25 Cal Ratsniper 36grn slug BC-092218.jpg


Shot group:

(Picture may be added later)

Note: In the past I've included photos of the shot groups, measured for group size, etc. Today I simply shot to measure the ballistics and kept the point of aim on the same spot. Another time I will shoot groups to post a comparison (above) for further info for the comparison.

And the raw data, summarized in chart form :

1537664766_1152434025ba6e6fed3f3a2.93442149_FX WildCat 5 pellet BC Summary.jpg


So what do you do with the BC numbers now that they're shown for the combo above? Good question. What I do is feed that info into the Chairgun Pro App and create a ballistics card (range card) that goes on my gun for reference while out shooting. I shoot a MIL-MIL combo so all I have to do is rangefind, dial in the correct compensation, and shoot straight on. Here's a sample card, and what it looks like on my gun:

1537665192_16650468735ba6e8a8124324.93206562_RAW HM1000x JSB Mk I Range Card.jpg
1537665507_14416046575ba6e9e32791a5.40275743_IMG_5262.JPG


Which is really just a handy reference for the plot shown below:

1537665672_21091034615ba6ea88e55e12.23713239_Ballistics Plot-RAW HM1000x.jpg


Please ask if you have any questions (or point out any typos). I hope you find this info helpful? Is so, please consider taking a second and simply leaving a '+' with a nice comment for me-it let's me know my time and effort is appreciated and keeps me going with this kind of work for the community. I've spent a bunch of money on Chronographs now, lead and time so it's a pretty small way of saying 'thanks for the efforts'. Enough said- Enjoy!



Sean


 
  • Like
Reactions: cosmic and chohan
Nice review of your details, Sean.

I have the same gun with a Donny Shogun on it. The gun comes with the smooth twist liner (Not the X liner). I got mine out this weekend and was shooting bottle caps at 64 yards.

I was using the JSB lites, too. Do you have a card or a way to get the drop data on this pellet when sighted in at 50 or 65 yrds? I have a Vortex Diamondback 6x24x50, but I couldn't switch it out with my UTG, as I didn't have a 3.5mm hex wrench for the mounts.
 
Nice work Sean, we appreciate you taking the time to do all this and present it so well. I'm surprised you don't have your click adjustments on you range card. I enjoy using mine while shooting off the bench to confirm the data and scopes are synced with each other. If I have time while pesting at the dairy I'll use it there as well with great results. Been using Strelok a lot lately and it comes in very handy. On my Wildcat I taped my range card to the back of the stock including reticle line yardages and their click equivalent, on the side of course, lol.

Thanks again
 
Nice review of your details, Sean.

I have the same gun with a Donny Shogun on it. The gun comes with the smooth twist liner (Not the X liner). I got mine out this weekend and was shooting bottle caps at 64 yards.

I was using the JSB lites, too. Do you have a card or a way to get the drop data on this pellet when sighted in at 50 or 65 yrds? I have a Vortex Diamondback 6x24x50, but I couldn't switch it out with my UTG, as I didn't have a 3.5mm hex wrench for the mounts.

Thanks for the info on the barrel liner-I’m a newbie to FX so I’m still learning the lineup...

Yes, that barrel really seems to like the lites a lot-it shoots them vwry accurately.

Certainly-I would be glad to make you up a card (or several). Would you like me to post it as an image? How far out in range do you want to go? What is your sight height above the barrel (centerline to centerline)? What temp do you want me to set it up for? Those are a few details that get plugged into the Chairgun Pro app to make the cards. If you want to download the app and play around with it, I can coach you a little about how to make up the cards? Just let me know...



Sean
 
Nice work Sean, we appreciate you taking the time to do all this and present it so well. I'm surprised you don't have your click adjustments on you range card. I enjoy using mine while shooting off the bench to confirm the data and scopes are synced with each other. If I have time while pesting at the dairy I'll use it there as well with great results. Been using Strelok a lot lately and it comes in very handy. On my Wildcat I taped my range card to the back of the stock including reticle line yardages and their click equivalent, on the side of course, lol.

Thanks again

Thanks-I appreciate the comments. :)

Regarding the click adjustments: actually with this scope, they're not needed because the scope is a MIL-MIL scope (MIL dot reticle, MIL turrets). The turret clicks are marked off in full, '1 MIL' increments with every 0.1 MIL marked as a smaller hash mark on the turret. Thus I simply sight the gun in at 50 yards, reset the turret to be at '0 MIL' where it's sighted in, and then read off the card to dial in the compensation. Thus at 75 yards, if it calls for '-1.4 MIL' compensation, I know the pellet will be low by 1.4 MIL at that distance so I simply turn the turret (in the up direction) to 4 hash marks past the '1 MIL' mark and I'm dialed right in. When done, I set it back to '0 MIL' as my 'home location' (so to speak). It's really super easy and there are no click counts needed (nor distance markings on the turret, etc.). From now on, I won't buy any scope unless it's 'MIL - MIL' (or 'MOA - MOA', but I prefer MIL-MIL). Here's the scope I have on my son's and my guns.

For range cards, check out range cards sold by Anarchy Outdoors That is what I currently have on my RAW and love it so far. The card keeps the tape residue off your stock.



Sean
 
No problem-great to see other ‘nerds’ joining the forum here (I’m a Mechanical Engineer mysef).

Now that I have an efficient means to gather the data, I plan to map BC changes vs Temp as well-so I will show that data for my RAW and my son’s FX. I figure its important to know how the compensation works vs temp when we hit the woods to hunt critters-don’t want surprises resulting from sighting in at 85F, and then missing (or wounding) animals when its 25F outside...

Sean
 
Nice work Sean, we appreciate you taking the time to do all this and present it so well. I'm surprised you don't have your click adjustments on you range card. I enjoy using mine while shooting off the bench to confirm the data and scopes are synced with each other. If I have time while pesting at the dairy I'll use it there as well with great results. Been using Strelok a lot lately and it comes in very handy. On my Wildcat I taped my range card to the back of the stock including reticle line yardages and their click equivalent, on the side of course, lol.

Thanks again

Thanks-I appreciate the comments. :)

Regarding the click adjustments: actually with this scope, they're not needed because the scope is a MIL-MIL scope (MIL dot reticle, MIL turrets). The turret clicks are marked off in full, '1 MIL' increments with every 0.1 MIL marked as a smaller hash mark on the turret. Thus I simply sight the gun in at 50 yards, reset the turret to be at '0 MIL' where it's sighted in, and then read off the card to dial in the compensation. Thus at 75 yards, if it calls for '-1.4 MIL' compensation, I know the pellet will be low by 1.4 MIL at that distance so I simply turn the turret (in the up direction) to 4 hash marks past the '1 MIL' mark and I'm dialed right in. When done, I set it back to '0 MIL' as my 'home location' (so to speak). It's really super easy and there are no click counts needed (nor distance markings on the turret, etc.). From now on, I won't buy any scope unless it's 'MIL - MIL' (or 'MOA - MOA', but I prefer MIL-MIL). Here's the scope I have on my son's and my guns.

For range cards, check out range cards sold by Anarchy Outdoors That is what I currently have on my RAW and love it so far. The card keeps the tape residue off your stock.



Sean

Thanks Sean, I'm embarrassed to say but I finally understand what others have talked about when preferring a Mil-Mil scope. Your explanation really cleared that up. That might come into play if I ever get another scope.

Thanks so much for the schooling.


 
No problem at all! I too had shot for a very long time and never ‘got it’ so to speak. I finally thought to myself: ‘this has to be easier than what I’m experiencing-if snipers can do this stuff on the spot, in the field with no apps, then I must be missing something.’ I was. The biggest problem is all the stupid ‘mixed units’ on most of the scopes nowadays (there is a movement to go consistent units and FFP also). The mixed units are what cause all the complexity.

I too was embarrassed (doubly so being an engineer!) when I finally figured out how easy it really is.

Anyway, glad to help.

Sean
 
The other thing I didn’t say: with the MIL reticle, you can take a shot, see where it hit (compared to where you aim) and then use the reticle as a ‘tape measure (in MIL units)’ to measure how far off your shot was. Measure the distance, dial that into the turret adjustments and shoot again-you’ll be spot on.

With a SFP (second focal plane) scope you have to be at the cirrect magnification for the measurement to be correct (otherwise it will be scaled by how far different you are in magnification). With a FFP scope, its indepedent of magnification as the reticle grows and shrinks with ‘zoom’.

Its really slick when you put it all together.



Sean