FX Impact X (Impact) How to know if you have updated Regulator (Photo)

Funshine

Member
Aug 26, 2018
389
13
FL
1536176102_9503503795b902fe6be56b7.46850754_IMG_3110.JPG


After reading another thread, I thought you guys may want to see this. Ernest explained that if the trigger guard was removed, there should be a number on the block. Having the number on the block means that the Regulator is the updated one. Hope it helps

regards
 
I bought an Impact just prior to the release of the Impact X, it came with a ST barrel but included the STX barrel. I have checked, and I do have the numbers on the block indicating the new regulator.

What I'd like to know is what is different about the old vs new regulators.

All the vids I see basically say its suppose to be better, but with no mention how, or why.

Anyone know why?
 
The only information I know is: On a video by Matt Dubber comparing the FX Impact vs the FX Impact X, he pointed out some of the upgrades. Matt went on to say that the X was a completely different gun in comparison to the older version. He also mentioned that the FX Impact Mark I ( which I figure is the one that was upgraded from the older ones, but prior to the X's had the upgraded regulator, too. Apparently, you can increase Regulator pressure to beyond 150 bars and maybe up to 180 bars. You are also able to decrease the Regulator pressure without removal of the bottle and bleeding the gun of air. Please don't knock me on this information, I got all this from the You tube Video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2LBFK9VoMw 

I hope this clear things up.
 
Hi All,

Once again, I am no expert, but I have access to all three versions of the Impact. In the interest of clearing up confusion created by so called experts (read Matt, not Ernest) here are the differences.

First Impact series:

Pointy reg adjuster, Short piston, 9mm reg body, 11 spring washers of which two are black and thinner than the rest, duro 70 orings.

Second series:

Serial number stamped on receiver, domed reg adjuster, long piston, 9 mm reg body, 16 spring washers all the same, some duro 90 orings, reg body/adjuster and receiver dimensions changed to allow for hole locations and adjuster screw alignment. This config can’t be used on series 1.

X series:

Serial number stamped on receiver, domed reg adjuster, long piston, 10 mm reg body, 11 larger spring washers all the same, some duro 90 orings, reg body and receiver dimensions changed to allow for hole locations and adjuster screw alignment. This config can’t be used on series 1 or 2.

Regarding adjusting the reg, version 2 and version X technically can be adjusted down under pressure, BUT, this needs to be done while the piston is not under back pressure. So fire the gun and turn screw at the same time in small increments to relieve said back pressure.


 
I am just speculating at the moment as I am waiting for the next batch of Humas to be produced and shipped down here, but I do not think the current version of the Huma will fit the ImpactX, I have a feeling that the reg will not fit the Gen 1 either.

Given the tolerances in the action, the placement of the inlet and outlet holes, the piston length and the reg body dimensions it must have been hard choosing a version to focus on, If I were Huub I probably would have done exactly what he did and focus on the second version. This version should also work in the Crown, unless FX changed the crown to accommodate the newest reg. I will not be buying another Crown so if anyone wants to donate me a newer one I would be happy to do the measuring:)

Can't wait actually as I have Huma Vulcan gen4 and its bananas consistent...
 
I did here Matt say the regulator could be adjusted down and thought it may not have been a wise thing to say. I have adjusted the regulator pressure down by timing the turning of the Allen key after a shot but I don’t do it anymore. One of the reasons it was even possible is because of the slowish recovery time of the regulator. You still risk damaging the piston. Not worth it. 

If the Huma recovers quickly it won’t be possible with it either. Thanks for info riazp. 
 
Sooner or later FX needs to purchase regulators from Huma and install them in their rifles at the factory. These are the Achilles heel of FX air rifles. Daystate finally wised-up and began installing Huma regulators in their rifles and the Brocock line of rifles this year. I would gladly pay an extra $100 or $200 for a brand new FX air rifle that came with a Huma regulator installed at the factory in the first place.
 
Sooner or later FX needs to purchase regulators from Huma and install them in their rifles at the factory. These are the Achilles heel of FX air rifles. Daystate finally wised-up and began installing Huma regulators in their rifles and the Brocock line of rifles this year. I would gladly pay an extra $100 or $200 for a brand new FX air rifle that came with a Huma regulator installed at the factory in the first place.

Come on Chuck, now you are making it look much more dramatic than it actually is. I definitely wouldn't call FX regulators their Achilles heel. With all due respect, I almost get the feeling you are being sponsored by HuMa, because that word pops up in almost every post you make. (No offence)

I have had so many FX-es I lost count, and never had an issue with the regulator which couldn't be solved with a bit of technical knowledge and a few o-rings. And remember, FX is sold many times more than the other brands, so it is pretty obvious that more sales also means more reported issues. 

FX has been regulating their guns with their own design for numerous years, do you really think they do not know what they are doing? Now, all of a sudden starting as of this year, the other big players like Daystate and Air Arms have jumped on the bandwagon to regulate their guns too......... 10 years late.......

I like Huma, they are Dutch, just like me, and they make a good product, but that doesn't mean that all other regulators suck.



Just my 2cents....