Daystate Pulsar, owner's reviews; where are they ?

I was just wondering the same thing.... I have read reports/reviews of sub-12ft/lb Pulsar owners, but have heard nothing re: the "FAC" (35 ft/lb) version of the gun. I can only speculate why this is so........so, I won't. Maybe Tony Belas will see your Topic and offer some words.

My brother received his pulsar OS a couple of months ago but had to send it back after a fortnight for routine adjustments and we haven't heard from daystate since. The pulsar shot really well using the single shot tray but was like a shotgun when using the magazine. My bro is disgusted to say the least at the service he has recieved from daystate. Why send a gun out if it isn't ready. He paid £2000 for his pulsar but is now regretting buying it. Shame on you daystate!

i honestly dont get why anyone would want a electronic gun.. and that on top of it all looks as bad as the pulsar

shure it has its good sides ,, getting rid of the "trigger rod" and having built in laser and bubble level , but by all that is holy , why make it so dang ugly ?

I actually like the look of the Pulsar. It's worst photo-angle is by far the side view. Yet, that is what you usually see in photos. If you can actually get one in your paws, I think you are likely to at least "soften" your opinion.

But, we are getting off-topic..... Anyone who ordered a .22 FAC Pulsar have it arrive?

IMHO the Pulsar is very expensive and have a odd look - I dubt it will be a good seller for Daystate.

Here in Sweden its off limits due to its pistol grip, those kind of features makes it impossible to put on FAC, making it legal to own.

I don't know what everyone is talking about this gun is sick! I really like the grey wood laminate stock.

As of middle of this week, AOA had not seen the 20 USA Oro's yet.