Like a few others here, I have experience with all three of your potential choices. One thing not yet mentioned is that the hw80 and the hw35 both use a larger 30mm compression chamber, whereas the hw95 has a 26mm compression chamber. I much prefer the shot cycle of the 26mm design. IMHO, the 30mm chamber just feels too snappy and harsh. The hw95 is an excellent all-round workhorse spring gun that can do most anything well and can be tuned to shoot accurately between 10fpe and 15fpe.
That said, if I could only have one Weihrauch springer (perish the thought), it would be an hw50 in .177.
Good luck choosing.
R
All are solid ideas listed above for the reasons each says.
I can say I have all HW80s (all calibers) HW95s (all calibers) and HW35Es (Silver and Blue in both .177 and .22).
I also have had all calbers except .25 in HW50. (the .20 is kind of harder to find but worth it especially in the HW50 machine)
The only HW50s I have now are .20 scoped and .20 unscoped (each dedicated to their own sight to prevent worry about POI shift with the dedicated sight).
I would lean toward the HW95 or HW95L or best, the HW98.
The HW80s are indeed heavy, long, touchy, and vastly overpowered for what accuracy and a bit less power provides (I.e. the HW98--perfect balance of all).
If more power than an HW95 or 98 is needed, I'd suggest the D54 sidelever. I liked the model first time I tried it out (donated for my use for two months by Hector in .20).
The D54 is a robust rifle, but IT MAKES YOU SLOW DOWN between shots to make the MOST of each shot--and it IS RECOILLESS. No recoil that you feel AT ALL!
I will always support the HW95/95L/98 before the HW80 or HW35E or HW50.
But in the face of the D54 every rifle I own now does take a back seat to its ability and accuracy.
Kindly,
Mike do you own all models of springers ever made? Or is there one that you haven’t found yet! Enjoy your information and pictures you share with us keep it coming. ThanksOnce again old news and mentioned several times, you keep repeating the same thing so I'll repeat again. Beeman never said they made anything. Importer, not hard to understand really, but to say "don't go Beeman" and or Chinese made is again very misleading. Had you mentioned new Beeman product that would be quite different. Said nothing about made by...
No, not even close and don't really aspire to. I collect what I like and like what I collect. Really it's about suiting my eye mostly but I do gravitate towards classic and rare specimen's. Believe it or not there are dozens more I would love to track down some day.Mike do you own all models of springers ever made? Or is there one that you haven’t found yet! Enjoy your information and pictures you share with us keep it coming. Thanks