CANT , and it's effect ?

Cant would be the scopes lateral post not being mounted in line with the center of the bore. (i.e. the center post is not plumb.)

Your handling of the rifle may cause the entire rifle to be canted even if the center post is perfectly centered in line with the rifle, but that deficiency is your fault and the adjustment needs to made with you being more mindful of it when you are aiming. .

 
This guy defies all rules of CANT, lol. 









https://youtu.be/WLSLJHG_T1g






good gravy thats frustrating to watch for some reason. humans like things centered.

i think this dude is putting the scope cam on crooked? the horizon lines, fence etc. look to be ALMOST as crooked as the horizontal scope crosshairs...

Screen Shot 2021-04-09 at 2.30.13 PM.1618000310.png
 

but just almost lol




 
The military, and excepted science both believe the myth to this day. If mans understanding of the effects of cant were wrong nasa would have missed the moon.

But yeah think all agree trigger location has no effect. Lol

Trigger location would have no effect. As to "myth", feel free to prove that in any manner other than quoting the zottesfeld article.
 
Bandg

Yes scope height matters as it increases so will the effects of cant. If you believe that you too believe what others here call a myth. And you are right just like the military and science. Because its not a myth its a fact.


After reading your above post and this one, I'm confused about what you are saying. Please be painfully clear so all can understand. Does increasing scope height increase the amount of cant error. I say it does and many others call that a "myth". Unfortunately, I'm not clear on what you are calling a "myth". Gunnertrones agrees with those that say scope (or sight) height does not matter. I say it does. Feel free to clarify with a simple "yes height matters" or "no height doesn't matter".
 
20210410_130721.1618084327.jpg
Below are some pictures of a bit of shooting today. I still have a larger view of the right side that I'm trying to get to post but I think all areas can be seen. All canted shooting was done with counterclockwise rotation-bore moving right in relation to LOS so cant error was causing movement to left of POI. Note that wind was from the left and was gradually increasing which will be noted below.

Left photo (and center because I couldn't get the right photo to load) shows zeroing open sights at 20 yards then canted shots (using the dashed line as cant amount) at 40 yards. Very hard to shoot that way as most can imagine but you can see the displacement. I believe I'm pretty accurate with the mark for center at 1" left. A gust of wind caught the one shot with the (X wind) marked by it. These LGV open sights are relatively tall and that increases the amount of cant error (or said another way, it decreases the difference that would be seen between the open sights and the scope) than would more common lower mounted open sights. All relative

Right photo shows both the open sights and the scope. Two marked groups can be seen on the scoped side, one circled and one in squares. They correspond to the two lines for cant marked. More cant, more movement of POI to left. The more relevant point is that the displacement to left with open sights (lower) seems to be about 1" while the displacement to left with the scope (higher) is noticeably more, as marked below the groups.

Not as precise as it could be and I will attempt to do similar at some point using two scopes but I do believe it illustrates the point. Also, the wind from the left was gradually increasing throughout the session so the open sight shooting done first would have been less impacted by the wind from the left than would the scoped shooting that was done second. The scope was mounted in high rings on top of a dovetail to picatinny adapter for as much height as I could get. The open sight height on the LGV is about 1.25" (relatively tall for open sights) and the mounted scope height was about 3".

20210410_130710.1618079923.jpg
20210410_130710.1618080145.jpg
20210410_130537.1618080300.jpg


I believe this shows that the higher the sight is mounted, the more cant error will be seen in POI. 

Some things I'll note for the naysayers. 

First, I made sure to try to cant the open sighted shooting AT LEAST to the line marked as much as possible and that should mean maximum displacement of POI to the left. Similarly, I tried to only get close to the cant marks with the scope thus canting relatively less thus minimizing displacement. In other words, I tried to minimize any "fudging" to increase the low sight displacment seen and decrease high sight displacement seen. And still, even along with the increasing wind from the left that came up while shooting with the higher sight which would decrease the amount of displacement seen, the higher sight created MORE displacement to the left than did the lower sight. Higher sight, more cant error.

Second, and before someone chimes in with "it's a ranging error", I'll state clearly that after zeroing at 20 yards I fired shots with each sight at 40 yards to determine amount of drop for each and hold accordingly. The tall open sights on the LGV created a POI just at the top edge of the aim point at 40 yards so range was correct with that aim. For the tall mounted scope, the shots were hitting 1/2 dot high at 40 yards so I used a 1/2 dot low hold as the aiming point and verified both correct for the range with sighter shots. NO RANGING ERROR. Each elevation was verified correct for the distance. 

Third, note that this comparison distance is only 1 multiple of the zero distance. Longer distance equals not only more displacement of POI for each sight height but also increases any difference between the two because of trigonometry-it is dependent on the angle created by the cant.

I hope to be able to do this under more controlled conditions (indoor or at least under completely calm conditions) and with laser sighting (to make the shooting more precise) at some point and I intend to try to get that done but all of this involves removing scopes, stacking mounts, rezeroing, and trying to get the shooting done so it is time consuming. But I believe the pictured results show that higher sights create more cant error effect on POI.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Micro
Then we agree.

We agree - cant is simply described an arc of a circle or movement of a line drawn from the center of the axis of the bore to the intersection of the scope's crosshair; you may think of this as the radius. The larger or longer the radius, the larger the circle; and therefore; same amount of cant or "hold error" at the axis of the crosshair when applied to the larger circle or higher mounted sight will cause greater travel on the outside of the circle - simple right?