benefits from fixed magnification Scope

Hi,

can someone explain me the benefits from a fixed magnification power scope ?
its cheaper because less moving parts, defective rates are lower because of less moving parts
.... ok, got that. are their any more benefits ?
better view when its getting darker ? better field of view ? would like that!

im shooting (only paper targets) now up to 50 yards and a cheap nikko stirling airking 4-12 works fine for me.
one the next purchase i want to step up a quality level (airgun AND scope)

next airgun will be used for paper and small steel targets again but max. range up to 30 yards
i want a side focus and fixed magnification or not ?
 
Endeavor - what are the highest magnifications on your scopes. I agree on on shooting at highest magnification possible, but only up to about 18x, but past that, the eye-box gets so small I can't see anything. When you say higher magnifications for target shooting, what would you call higher?

The reason I ask is that for me, anything past about 18x gets so hard to deal with that to me it is pretty useless. Just curious if you've got something I can learn about higher magnifications.

And, yes, Fixed magnification scopes are sharper. Only hesitation I have is that most have a fixed parallax at around 100 yards. On shorter ranges like 25 yards, this can leave 2/3 inch targeting error on a scope that is dead on at 100 yards. If you can get a scope that has parallax adjustment, and is fixed, probably sharpest combo you can get.
 
For the past 40 years or so I've owned only variable power scopes, mostly rimfire and centerfire. A month ago I bought a fixed 10 from SWFA (Demo A). Love it! It has PA down to 10 yards (or less).

I found with 3x9, 4x10, 4x12, etc. that I usually had the setting on 9 or higher. I'm primarily a plinker with squirrel hunting (not pesting) my objective. 

I'd probably like an 8X better than a 10 (greater field of view) but SWFA didn't have that. I almost bought a Weaver Classic 8 but didn't. The price is sure nice for that weaver though!
 
Let me give a slightly different opinion to muddy the water. Years ago, when zoom lenses and variable magnification scopes were new, yes, the fixed magnification scopes were significantly sharper. The optical design was / is so much sharper on a fixed over a variable scope. Today, not so much.

​​The real sharpness difference is in the lower end optics. Buying quality optics rather than go cheap eliminates most of the sharpness differences. Good design will cost a bit more, and variable power scopes do use more glass so they tend to cost more than fixed. A high quality fixed will be less expensive than a high quality variable, but if you compare a high quality fixed to a high quality variable, you won't see much difference these days. Moderate range, same thing. When comparing, it's important to compare roughly equal quality (that doesn't always mean price) scopes.

​If you have a fixed price point, the fixed might be sharper at that point, but (there's always a but) how sharp do you need? Is that sharp enough to give up variable? That's your call.