Actual Magnification

So I just got out of the hospital a few days ago, hernia surgery, and am restricted to doing damn little so as to assure my staples stay intact. As I'm inclined to do when I have too much time on my hands, I've thought of lots of dumb@ss stuff to search on the internet for just out of curiosity. On this particular occasion, I've been searching the internet for the past hour or so trying to find some method of checking the actual magnification of a rifle scope. Seems like it ought to matter but I cannot find a damn thing useful here or elsewhere. I thought I saw something here on AGN some time ago but cannot find it again. Thanks in advance if you can enlighten me on the subject.
 
I was kind of afraid of that. Looks like I may have to wait for Stephen Archer and Hard Air Magazine to step up their scope reviews to know for sure. It's hard to believe that it's just a guessing game. I'll bet a lot of inexpensive scopes are cheating, and not a few quite a lot. Maybe the best we can do is check scope magnification against a known spec. Leupold publishes actual magnification for example which one would hope is good data. Didn't I see somewhere Chairgun was being used to check magnification?
 
There are a couple ways to verify, but nothing 100%.



It's pretty obvious that the magnification markings are off a little on some scopes. For an SFP scope you can use the stadia spacing of the reticle to verify the magnification markings. I have to assume that the reticle is made to the correct size. For instance, scaled so that a mil-dot spans one milliradian (usually at 10x). If it only spans say 0.9 milliradian, then the actual magnification for that scope would be 10/0.9=11.1x.



For a standard (10x) mil-dot. Setup a ruler or yardstick at 100ft from the reticle (measure distance to the magnification ring which is near the gimbal/magnification ring).



If 10 mil dots spans 10” across the ruler then it is at 10x magnification.

If they span 9” then it is 11.1x

If they span 11”, then it is 9.1x

etc.



If you don't have a stadia style reticle, or you have a FFP scope, then you can use the advertised FOV at min and max magnifications and compare those values to what you actually get at different magnification settings.



Even when the magnification markings are not too accurate, most reputable manufacturers can get the reticle size and FOV values correct, since they are less dependent on tolerances.



Though it's also possible that a cheap scope has no accurate references. In that case, take a digital picture in/out of the scope and count pixels. Though that is more involved.