Inspired by the recent release of Hatsan's .30 springer and another semi-related thread, a question has planted itself in my brain, and I would be interested to hear the opinions of my fellow airgunners (especially those who have a deep understanding of powerplant mechanics and limitations). Namely, is it theoretically possible to create a viable large-game hunting rifle (meaning .45 or .50 cal, 800-1000 fps) using a spring or gas-ram powerplant? Logistical considerations aside (cost, weight, insane cocking force and murderous recoil), is it possible to produce sufficient muzzle velocity, and how might it be done? If we can come up with a decent answer (and I can come up with the cash), this may turn into a custom-built abomination.
Here are my thoughts on how it may be done: Start with the basic platform of a Hatsan 155 (gas ram, underlever, bolt-action sliding breech, Monte Carlo stock), reinforce the cocking arm to levels heretofore unknown (a rectangular steel bar rather than a round rod, likely knurled for grip), increase the diameter and wall thickness of the compression cylinder (45 mm, perhaps larger?) without lengthening it (unless this is necessary. If I am correct, larger diameter= more power per cycle, while longer stroke= longer shot cycle). I can't help but think the recoil of this thing would make a scope pointless, so I'm thinking a simple set of fiber-optic iron sights. A bench-rest stock might be useful, or at least a mount for a bipod. Weight-wise, this thing is going to turn out 20 pounds bare minimum, and I'd shell out the extra cash (and weight) for hardwood.
Now that you've heard my theoretical musings, I want to hear from you. Is this even possible, let alone wise? If it is possible (or if not and you just want to play pretend), how would you do it? Let's make a Monster!
Here are my thoughts on how it may be done: Start with the basic platform of a Hatsan 155 (gas ram, underlever, bolt-action sliding breech, Monte Carlo stock), reinforce the cocking arm to levels heretofore unknown (a rectangular steel bar rather than a round rod, likely knurled for grip), increase the diameter and wall thickness of the compression cylinder (45 mm, perhaps larger?) without lengthening it (unless this is necessary. If I am correct, larger diameter= more power per cycle, while longer stroke= longer shot cycle). I can't help but think the recoil of this thing would make a scope pointless, so I'm thinking a simple set of fiber-optic iron sights. A bench-rest stock might be useful, or at least a mount for a bipod. Weight-wise, this thing is going to turn out 20 pounds bare minimum, and I'd shell out the extra cash (and weight) for hardwood.
Now that you've heard my theoretical musings, I want to hear from you. Is this even possible, let alone wise? If it is possible (or if not and you just want to play pretend), how would you do it? Let's make a Monster!