hawkeye69 -
I think quality is in the eye of the beholder. I used to do Quality Improvement and it was never easy to define quality, because everyone had a different definition of what was important to them.
My definition will be very different from yours or Kaylaindy. Kaylaindy is more into hunting so the toughness, and "good enough" accuracy is the quality he's looking for. Me, I'm a bench shooter, so the "Good Enough" accuracy at 30 yards really kills me at 100 yards. I have a Marauder that I can shoot quarter sized groups at 75 yards, and that's not good enough for what I want. I suspect that Kaylaindy would be more than willing to accept the quarter sized groups at 75 yards for his purposes.
I understand the argument for the Gauntlet, but for me, my definition of quality is different. The Gauntlet holds no allure because it isn't designed for what I want.
Actually, I'm watching the Crosman site to buy a Euro Maximus. Everyone knows the Maximus is an inexpensive PCP, with severe limitations, but this model has two things I want, and that's sub-12 fpe and incredibly cheap at $165 (using the discount). To me, the Maximus will be adequate qualities for what I'm buying the gun for. It sure won't hit 100 yard dime sized groups, but that's not the quality I want in this particular gun. I want something low powered for backyard fun.
Oh well, enough pontificating. We all have different views of quality, that's why we have so many gun choices. And I agree, anyone buying a Gauntlet, Maximus, Fortitude, or other less expensive gun, expecting to out shoot Ted at Extreme Bench Rest with his Impact will be sorely disappointed. The gun has to match the purpose, so you buy the qualities that fit.
Maybe we should view our guns like a bag of golf clubs. I've want a pitching Wedge for close up shooting (sub 12 FPE), and an driver for the long shots (Impact), like the 100 yard shots. Just more excuses to buy more guns, after all, you gotta fill that golf bag.