Why is it, that everyone wants a scope with a zillion times power?

I have always wondered, why anyone would buy a scope with a top magnification of 30 or better, when most of the shots they take are under 50 yards!

If you're one of those nuts who likes Field Trial, shooting contests, sobeit! But for the rest of us, the average "hunting" target is under 50 yards! Why the heck do you need 10+ power to see it? The simple answer is, you don't! The long answer is, you like to spend money better spent on a better airgun, not a scope!
 
I have always wondered, why anyone would buy a scope with a top magnification of 30 or better, when most of the shots they take are under 50 yards!

If you're one of those nuts who likes Field Trial, shooting contests, sobeit! But for the rest of us, the average "hunting" target is under 50 yards! Why the heck do you need 10+ power to see it? The simple answer is, you don't! The long answer is, you like to spend money better spent on a better airgun, not a scope!

~~~~~~~~

"...spending money..."

Well, I have to spend it before my wife wastes it. And I'm buying air rifles as fast as I can get there sales reps on the line.


 
Well, as an ex Field Target nut, I just got used to it and don't see myself going back to anything less than 20 power.

It's really nice to be able to see the 2 mm 10 ring on a 25 meter target using 30 power. It's also nice to be able to shoot 100 yd groups and see how you are grouping without the need for a spotting scope?

I used to wonder the same as you, but after using these higher magnification scopes and getting so comfortable with them I can just never go back to the lower power scopes.

Not only is it nice to be able to see the 2mm 10 ring, it's nice to be able to read the number on each kz as you're shooting. Now if hunting was all I did then I would bring it down to 10 power ;-)

1542852584_14902718665bf60fe816d483.51128240_C 11-17-17.jpg


Peace and High Mag Nut Grease

Fuss
 
I hunt in mountains. I don't sit in one spot. I use the higher power to look further away, to see if there is something worth hunting in an area before I go trekking up the side of a mountain to get there. In the border mountains in Arizona, there is always a risk of running across human and drug smugglers (you don't want to walk up that with an air rifle). As other have said, it is nice to look at a 100 Meter target and see EACH hole and know where the impact was. It is also good to be able to examine the hole at that distance, and tell if it went straight through, or was tumbling (when playing with different velocities and pellets/slugs). But when I am not spotting, normally I am about 10 to 15 power.
 
I have always wondered, why anyone would buy a scope with a top magnification of 30 or better, when most of the shots they take are under 50 yards!

If you're one of those nuts who likes Field Trial, shooting contests, sobeit! But for the rest of us, the average "hunting" target is under 50 yards! Why the heck do you need 10+ power to see it? The simple answer is, you don't! The long answer is, you like to spend money better spent on a better airgun, not a scope!

I agree with you in your conclusion, but disagree on some of the reasons. 

1. Distance has nothing to do with magnification. It's the size of the target. If one tries to shoot a .177 pellet hole at 30 yards one is shooting a 0 .5 moa target which is equivalent to shooting a 10" target at slightly more than a mile! That does require some serious magnification. 

2. Money spent on a scope-- sighting device-- is as important as your rifle. Your scope is what finally aims the rifle. Clear glass and good reticle is necessary. So I don't think that spending money on a scope is money wasted. 

However I agree with your conclusion. I think there's such a proliferation of magnification because,

1. In the U.S even casual airgunners shoot supported off fairly good rests. If the tradition was more standing shooting oriented then magnifications will drop. Without a great deal of practice shooting standing offhand at 24x magnification is a frightening experience! Also most airgunning is pretty static. If we regularly hiked for 5 miles to take a couple of shots, or had practical rifle shooting like competitions, a lot of people will shed their 25 oz Hubble telescopes. 

2. In an ironic way, it is BECAUSE airgunners shoot at 50 yards that there is such a proliferation of 200$ 24x scopes. When you shoot out to 1000 yards where such magnification may be necessary, one needs a) a very durable, reliable scope that can stand up to outdoor use, withstand the recoil and have repeatable clicks, and b) extremely good glass. Those scopes can be astronomically expensive. We can buy magnification for cheap which firearm shooters can't because they need much more serious equipment. 

Finally to a couple of other posters:

3. It is absolutely unnecessary to have ANY magnified optics to shoot the tiniest groups. Ask any 10m shooter, or small bore competitor. You can shoot the tiniest groups with iron sights if you have large enough targets. It is not necessary to SEE what you are shooting-- if that were the case no one will ever hit the x ring because I can guarantee that can not be seen without a spotting scope-- as long as what you're shooting is at the centre of your sight picture. 

4. A scope is a sighting device. If you are using it to check your target perhaps you need a good set of binoculars which also prevents you from aiming your airgun-- which still launches a projectile that can cause injuries-- at something you may not wish to shoot. 

I hope I didn't ruffle too many feathers by these statements. These are just my personal observations and I will gladly stand corrected. 
 
I like the horse power analogy. You don't necessarily need to spend a ton on scopes. The quality of even the cheap stuff has improved greatly a couple hundred will get you a decent scope. The challenge for air guns is only if you shoot indoors and need close focus ability or the springers taking them apart . 

Personally I think that viper pro would be the nuts for hunting and the Leopold EFR scopes for target work. 

Springers you're on your own. The heavy recoiling springers don't interest me and with the availability more reasonably priced PCP guns I see no need . Don't get me wrong I own and value a high quality spring piston gun I just don't need one shooting 1200 FPS ( they seem to sell a bunch of them at the chain stores however) I sure wouldn't put a high dollar scope on one of them warrantee or not. 

Buying a scope is like buying a car. Buy want you like and can afford but for the most part they will all get you there . 

Like driving it's the guy behind the wheel ( or the scope) that's the limiting factor most of the time.

Having said all that I like nice stuff. Cars and guns a scopes.

It is an interesting subject. I stopped at Gander looking at scopes. I looked thru a AIM alpha 6 scope. $250 Chinese I know some of the junk that's out there but that scope impressed me . I think the Chinese scopes are coming on . Didn't buy the scope but it tempted me to give it a try.
 
I started out with a 2-7x32 scope and thought it was awesome. As I got older, eyessight worse and a little more money in my pocket the higher mag scopes with better glass are a Godsend. Now when i look through my old (still in good condition) 2-7x32 scope it feels like im looking through a straw and wonder how i did it.



On a side note we need to start a new thread.....Bug busting wild insects. I used to put some honey on my 50 yard target and shoot the flies.
 
I think some of you should be careful talking about shooting insects. There are people reading this stuff who are pretty sure any one spending hundreds if not thousands of dollars on BB guns is certifiably insane . Should we add fuel? Do we care?

I used to shoot those big green flies off dog droppings with my daisy BB pistol when I was a kid.

But I have no reputation to preserve. My friend and family have all figured me out years ago. Only person who seems to be still questioning is my wife who seems to think it's more humorous then insane. ( or so I think) not asking her. She might think both.