This is actually an continuation of some questions that I had started with Steve on another topic, But felt that continuing the questions would be hijacking the original thread and so took it on myself to move it to a dedicated thread to allow it the attention it deserved without taking away from the original. Below is copied question I had asked and Steve's reply, The rest will be on this thread.
Everyone is welcome to join in, but please remember the forum rules about bashing and disrespect. I know that Both Michael and Steve has no issues with a person being blunt and open in asking questions but do so in a respectful manner. The questions started on this thread http://www.airgunnation.com/topic/aeac-reviews-the-kral-puncher-breaker/page/2/ March the 2nd
I will be honest, with the exception of perhaps seeing a passing review on You Tube I didn't even know who AEAC was until they joined up with AGN so many of my questions are not leading but honest questions of someone who wants to know.
Thanks again
ME
Steve, if I may I would like to act the devils avacate please take no offense. I do not know you and wouldn’t presume to start making slights on a person’s carector that I haven’t even meet before.
Perhaps by you answering these questions it will help settle questions about the process that you folks go through to get to even do these reviews on the products.
1. What is the process? That is to say does the manufacturer call you guys and say hey we want you to check this gun out, or do you guys call them, are you paid to perform the reviews or how do you make money (hey your a business it’s expected to make money)
2. Is it possible that you guys get a cherry picked product? I’m not even suggesting that you are doing anything wrong. As said I’ve worked in production lines and Q.C, when we had a show or demo models we would baby the demos all the way through the line and make sure we put the best foot forward.
3. Nobody’s perfect therefore no production line is perfect, what happens when you do get a product that doesn’t perform up to expectations. Obviously if you went online and started telling people this or that product isn’t up to par even if done nicely isn’t going to go over well
Thanks again for a your work and reviews and thank you for helping make AGN even better than before.
Steve, AEAC
Hi Willie,
Thanks for the questions… nobody’s had the courage to ask before so I appreciate the opportunity to share.
1) I can’t say exactly what the process is for the others (Rick, Ted, Giles, Matt) but what I can tell ya, is that I’ve spent time with all 4 and each cares very much about advancing the airgun industry, as well is having your absolute trust. None of the reviewers I know are willing forgo their integrity just for the opportunity to review an airgun and have it look good to you guys. In regards to picking product, the groups in my circle (Airguns of Arizona, Airgun Depot, Pyramyd Air, Crosman Corp, Rapid Air Weapons, Hatsan USA) all like to include me in the decision of what gets reviewed & when. They’ll usually make a recommendation and we go from there. I am paid, thank goodness. In April of this year I did a career 180, went full time with AEAC, and it’s now how I earn my living. Leaving a six figure income behind, I’ll freely admit… it’s been challenging. To those who would say this makes my message untrustworthy, I would encourage them to try an understand that a review outlet begins and ends with a high level of trust. Without an absolute credibility between us & our followers, we’ve nothing, and our sponsors know that. As a result, the clear message AEAC’s partners have always conveyed is very simply, “be honest.” I think in Zebra’s defense, my optimistic nature can come across as flakiness, cultivating prudence. To him, I would say; watch more of my vids
. I’ve bruised plenty of vendor/manufacturer egos by being truthful, lol. As for the revenue streams that make it work, there are several. YouTube pays for the monetization of my vids, sponsors like JSB, Predator, H&N, Splatterburst all advertise with AEAC just as a Chevy/GMC would advertise in the Super Bowl… same concept. My partnership with Crosman pays a commission every time you guys use my affiliate link & coupon code, and finally I’m paid directly for the 40-50 hours it takes to make each vid. Add em’ all up and you’ve got an income.
2) Absolutely not. In reality, I would say the opposite is true. I’m treated with a mild neglect when it comes to the vendors hand selecting product. Like you guys, every once in a blue moon I get shipped a shotgun and like you guys, I exchange it for another. We all know that these guns are supposed to be accurate to a certain standard and when we receive a total dud, it goes back. That’s what warranty is for and I use it just like you guys do. Even though it’s frustrating at times, I kind of like it this way. What I get is what you get and I feel this makes for a better review. As for shooting laser beam groups, the vendors actually like it when I shoot them a bit loose. The average consumer can’t always replicate what I put up and when they can’t, it creates problems for seller… so truth be told, not only do I refrain from shooting do-overs for you guys on YouTube, but I actually shoot them a tad loose in most situations.
3) It depends. In my experience, ALL airguns perform when they’ve been manufactured properly, the barrels are kept clean, and the right pellet is used. You should check out my blog over at AOA… I write about this sort of thing all the time. Like you guys, I know the airgun industry. I live on the forums reading. I’m always watching YouTube. I know what sucks and what’s good. For me, it’s simple… I steer clear of the garbage and will only review what I feel will be of value to you guys. There have been times where I’ve turned down product on account of this. To answer your question very directly though… if I get a bum gun and know it’s not supposed to be this way, I simply return it for repair or exchange it. I too come from a manufacturing background and know full well that airguns are made by people and like people, are far from perfect. I’m not doing the general public a service if I showcase the less than one tenth of a percent that act up on account of human error. It seems to make more sense to share the experience that 99.9% are going to receive with said product. And if things go really bad, I’m honest about it and move on… there’s an example out there that there’s no need for me to re-publicize.
Hope this helps.
Steve
Everyone is welcome to join in, but please remember the forum rules about bashing and disrespect. I know that Both Michael and Steve has no issues with a person being blunt and open in asking questions but do so in a respectful manner. The questions started on this thread http://www.airgunnation.com/topic/aeac-reviews-the-kral-puncher-breaker/page/2/ March the 2nd
I will be honest, with the exception of perhaps seeing a passing review on You Tube I didn't even know who AEAC was until they joined up with AGN so many of my questions are not leading but honest questions of someone who wants to know.
Thanks again
ME
Steve, if I may I would like to act the devils avacate please take no offense. I do not know you and wouldn’t presume to start making slights on a person’s carector that I haven’t even meet before.
Perhaps by you answering these questions it will help settle questions about the process that you folks go through to get to even do these reviews on the products.
1. What is the process? That is to say does the manufacturer call you guys and say hey we want you to check this gun out, or do you guys call them, are you paid to perform the reviews or how do you make money (hey your a business it’s expected to make money)
2. Is it possible that you guys get a cherry picked product? I’m not even suggesting that you are doing anything wrong. As said I’ve worked in production lines and Q.C, when we had a show or demo models we would baby the demos all the way through the line and make sure we put the best foot forward.
3. Nobody’s perfect therefore no production line is perfect, what happens when you do get a product that doesn’t perform up to expectations. Obviously if you went online and started telling people this or that product isn’t up to par even if done nicely isn’t going to go over well
Thanks again for a your work and reviews and thank you for helping make AGN even better than before.
Steve, AEAC
Hi Willie,
Thanks for the questions… nobody’s had the courage to ask before so I appreciate the opportunity to share.
1) I can’t say exactly what the process is for the others (Rick, Ted, Giles, Matt) but what I can tell ya, is that I’ve spent time with all 4 and each cares very much about advancing the airgun industry, as well is having your absolute trust. None of the reviewers I know are willing forgo their integrity just for the opportunity to review an airgun and have it look good to you guys. In regards to picking product, the groups in my circle (Airguns of Arizona, Airgun Depot, Pyramyd Air, Crosman Corp, Rapid Air Weapons, Hatsan USA) all like to include me in the decision of what gets reviewed & when. They’ll usually make a recommendation and we go from there. I am paid, thank goodness. In April of this year I did a career 180, went full time with AEAC, and it’s now how I earn my living. Leaving a six figure income behind, I’ll freely admit… it’s been challenging. To those who would say this makes my message untrustworthy, I would encourage them to try an understand that a review outlet begins and ends with a high level of trust. Without an absolute credibility between us & our followers, we’ve nothing, and our sponsors know that. As a result, the clear message AEAC’s partners have always conveyed is very simply, “be honest.” I think in Zebra’s defense, my optimistic nature can come across as flakiness, cultivating prudence. To him, I would say; watch more of my vids
2) Absolutely not. In reality, I would say the opposite is true. I’m treated with a mild neglect when it comes to the vendors hand selecting product. Like you guys, every once in a blue moon I get shipped a shotgun and like you guys, I exchange it for another. We all know that these guns are supposed to be accurate to a certain standard and when we receive a total dud, it goes back. That’s what warranty is for and I use it just like you guys do. Even though it’s frustrating at times, I kind of like it this way. What I get is what you get and I feel this makes for a better review. As for shooting laser beam groups, the vendors actually like it when I shoot them a bit loose. The average consumer can’t always replicate what I put up and when they can’t, it creates problems for seller… so truth be told, not only do I refrain from shooting do-overs for you guys on YouTube, but I actually shoot them a tad loose in most situations.
3) It depends. In my experience, ALL airguns perform when they’ve been manufactured properly, the barrels are kept clean, and the right pellet is used. You should check out my blog over at AOA… I write about this sort of thing all the time. Like you guys, I know the airgun industry. I live on the forums reading. I’m always watching YouTube. I know what sucks and what’s good. For me, it’s simple… I steer clear of the garbage and will only review what I feel will be of value to you guys. There have been times where I’ve turned down product on account of this. To answer your question very directly though… if I get a bum gun and know it’s not supposed to be this way, I simply return it for repair or exchange it. I too come from a manufacturing background and know full well that airguns are made by people and like people, are far from perfect. I’m not doing the general public a service if I showcase the less than one tenth of a percent that act up on account of human error. It seems to make more sense to share the experience that 99.9% are going to receive with said product. And if things go really bad, I’m honest about it and move on… there’s an example out there that there’s no need for me to re-publicize.
Hope this helps.
Steve