Despite many state and national champion titles, I don't even want to speculate what my answer would be, Vana. But
truth be told, my maximum range probably wouldn't differ much from your's. That confessed,
I'll take this opportunity to not only commend your honesty, but also your practice regimen.
Being a lifelong hunter, I've long been torn between strong hunting instincts and making my hunting more sporting propositions by using sporting means, methods and weapons. But no matter the chosen means, methods and weapons, the hunter owes the prey as humane demise as probable. No; in hunting, given anything less than a good brain-shot, humane demises are virtually impossible.
A good example is my decades-long archery and bowhunting affliction that
devolved through the decades from compound bows to recurves, to longbows, and ultimately, to stick-bows in order to make it necessary to approach quarry to almost spitting-distance, where the advantage shifts considerably to potential quarry. However I eventually gave up bowhunting because there is NO WAY to have confidence a well-launched arrow won't injure an animal that dodged before the arrow arrives ('jumped the string'). I still enjoy archery immensely; but for the therapeutic value, rather than a hunting method.
View attachment 458713 View attachment 458714 View attachment 458716 'Ladybug', my favorite bow (of my own making).
.
